November 26, 2024, 01:40:26 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Lava lamp formula research  (Read 6706 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ananova

  • Very New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Lava lamp formula research
« on: April 20, 2021, 08:58:11 PM »
I'm not a chemist, but I have an interest in restoring old lava lamps and being able to make lava lamps that flow like the older ones did in the 90's. In 2003 they moved manufacturing to China and have never been the same.

The basic breakdown of how a lava lamp works is the lightbulb provides heat that causes the wax to expand and become less dense than water which makes it rise until it contracts again. A surfactant is used to prevent the wax from sticking to the glass and to reduce surface tension to cause the wax to stretch instead of form nothing but round blobs. As the wax falls a metal spring (coil) breaks the surface tension and allows the wax to rejoin the main blob at the bottom.

I have my own liquid formula that I have been working on. This formula recreates the desired properties in the lamp, but I know it is not the same used in the original formula.

66.9% Water
24% Propylene Glycol
6% Glycerol
3% Sodium Lauryl Sulfate
0.01% Triton X-100 (1ML) - polyethylene glycol tert-octylphenol ethoxylate
*Final density has to be adjusted for variances of wax density by addition of water or glycerol.

The lamp seems to more or less flow like it should, but I can't help but wonder about about this formula breakdown I came across. The wax is actually really straight forward. The mystery for me is why they are using different chemicals and if it even really matters.

Here is the formula breakdown.
https://images.homedepot-static.com/catalog/pdfImages/89/89937a2d-c18f-4fc0-ac73-239f481c8a0b.pdf

1. What is the difference between sodium lauryl sulfate and magnesium lauryl sulfate? Why would one be used over the other? Common hobbyist formulas use sodium lauryl sulfate because it is easy to purchase. Is that an adequate substitute?
2. Is the Tetrasodium Ethylenediaminetetraacetate added to prevent rusting of the metal coil in the bottom of the bottle?
3. Is the hydrochloric acid added to adjust the PH so the Tetrasodium Ethylenediaminetetraacetate is at an appropriate PH range to function as a corrosion preventative?
4. I am assuming there are 3 surfactants. Magnesium lauryl sulfate, polyethylene glycol tert-octylphenol ethoxylate, and alcohols C10-C12 Ethoxylated. Why 3 and not just 1?
5. My assumption is polyethylene glycol is added to increase density and reduce thermal expansion of the water so the density remains stable at higher temperatures, but I could be wrong. Again common hobbyist recipes differ and use propylene glycol instead. What is the difference between the two?
6. Methyl Paraben. I assume this is just for antifungal properties?
« Last Edit: April 20, 2021, 09:10:56 PM by Ananova »

Offline Ananova

  • Very New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Lava lamp formula research
« Reply #1 on: May 19, 2021, 09:06:29 PM »
I guess I underestimated the complexity of the wax because once I dove into it I realized it was a beast of its own to figure out. The SDS sheets are misleading at best. Anyways in case anyone ever comes across this and takes interest I've been extensively documenting my work. I'll keep smashing things together and hoping they work, but it would be nice if I had some actual expertise interested in this project.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1KVck9CWQj3tfQXR5C5eE-CFjwad156RhBMYnCZehBfw/edit#gid=950924701
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nZCHLV5-GayA83oWkdMKBTB3u1zf_FPRjVU-x8WMxyQ/edit#

Offline Giorgiogiorgio

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 3
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Lava lamp formula research
« Reply #2 on: June 10, 2024, 05:52:30 PM »
I guess I underestimated the complexity of the wax because once I dove into it I realized it was a beast of its own to figure out. The SDS sheets are misleading at best. Anyways in case anyone ever comes across this and takes interest I've been extensively documenting my work. I'll keep smashing things together and hoping they work, but it would be nice if I had some actual expertise interested in this project.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1KVck9CWQj3tfQXR5C5eE-CFjwad156RhBMYnCZehBfw/edit#gid=950924701
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nZCHLV5-GayA83oWkdMKBTB3u1zf_FPRjVU-x8WMxyQ/edit#

Did you get anywhere with it?

They use naphtha solvent to reduce the viscosity of the microcrystaline wax which is weird since most recipes just use paraffin wax which has a lower viscosity from the start, the solvent is flammable but the lamp would never get anywhere near the flash point. They use different surfactants like MGL , PEG, EDTA and Triton X, they add antimoulding agent methyl paraben and increase the ph of the aqueous solution for this reason and to increase solubility for the surfactants, it increases corrosion instead of reducing it for common metals though. The surfactants reduce the surface tension of the water and allow the wax to flow freely through the water phase since water has more than 2 times the wax's surface tension.

Why is this in organic chemistry btw?

Offline Borek

  • Mr. pH
  • Administrator
  • Deity Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27862
  • Mole Snacks: +1813/-412
  • Gender: Male
  • I am known to be occasionally wrong.
    • Chembuddy
Re: Lava lamp formula research
« Reply #3 on: June 10, 2024, 06:03:10 PM »
Why is this in organic chemistry btw?

Good question, apparently missed that at the time of posting.

Moving to Citizen.
ChemBuddy chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation, titrations.info

Sponsored Links