November 14, 2024, 01:44:52 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: stereospecific reaction??  (Read 6985 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dolphinsiu

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 349
  • Mole Snacks: +3/-7
  • Gender: Male
stereospecific reaction??
« on: May 03, 2007, 10:07:56 AM »
cis-1,2-dibromocycloheane + KI ---> debromination product!

stereospecific ??

My teacher says it is stereospecific. Why it is stereospecific?

I still feel confused in definition of stereospecific
« Last Edit: May 03, 2007, 10:19:47 AM by Dolphinsiu »

Offline madscientist

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 225
  • Mole Snacks: +14/-7
  • University of New England Australia
Re: stereospecific reaction??
« Reply #1 on: May 03, 2007, 11:43:02 AM »
I think it might have somthing to do with the less sterically hindered (less crowded) site for debromination on the reagent.
The only stupid question is a question not asked.

Offline PRIYA1022

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61
  • Mole Snacks: +5/-2
Re: stereospecific reaction??
« Reply #2 on: May 03, 2007, 09:22:09 PM »
Is it debromination or dehydrobromination? I have never come across a debromination in presence of KI. And are you sure your teacher was referring to KI in that "stereospecific reaction" ?

Offline english

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 534
  • Mole Snacks: +31/-10
  • Gender: Male
  • grad student
Re: stereospecific reaction??
« Reply #3 on: May 03, 2007, 10:20:00 PM »
Stereospecific means one isomer of the reactant can lead to one set of stereoisomers, and another isomer of that reactant can lead to a different set of stereoisomers.

Offline Ψ×Ψ

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 263
  • Mole Snacks: +8/-4
  • ooh, shiny!
    • carbon-based curiosities
Re: stereospecific reaction??
« Reply #4 on: May 04, 2007, 01:44:51 AM »
This might also clear things up.

Offline Dolphinsiu

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 349
  • Mole Snacks: +3/-7
  • Gender: Male
Re: stereospecific reaction??
« Reply #5 on: May 04, 2007, 03:43:12 AM »
   I- -->Br
          /
   / \ / /
  /     /  Br -->
 / /\  / /
 /   

---> (Z)-cyclohexene + IBr + Br-

This is my notes.

If trans-form is used, (E)-cyclohexene is formed. I now know why it is stereospecific! Thank you!

Offline PRIYA1022

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61
  • Mole Snacks: +5/-2
Re: stereospecific reaction??
« Reply #6 on: May 04, 2007, 12:39:30 PM »

Can you have E and Z-CYCLOHEXENE?...
(There cannot be a trans double bond in a six membered cyclic compound.)
Are you sure you have it right in your notes???

Offline Ψ×Ψ

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 263
  • Mole Snacks: +8/-4
  • ooh, shiny!
    • carbon-based curiosities
Re: stereospecific reaction??
« Reply #7 on: May 04, 2007, 01:03:15 PM »
There can't be a TRANS-cyclohexene.  E and Z nomenclature refers to the relative position of the highest priority groups.  Depending on the substituent, I think a substituted E-cyclohexene is possible.

Offline Dolphinsiu

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 349
  • Mole Snacks: +3/-7
  • Gender: Male
Re: stereospecific reaction??
« Reply #8 on: May 05, 2007, 02:46:02 AM »
My notes says that it is two-step process: substitution of Br- by I- + Elimination for both Br- and I-.

Is it really stereospecific to your knowledge?

Sponsored Links