November 28, 2024, 08:41:41 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Synthetic equivalents  (Read 13815 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline minimal

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 83
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-0
Synthetic equivalents
« on: December 17, 2007, 04:01:50 PM »
I have a question after checking out the wikipedia page about synthons(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthon).  How do they determine that CN- is a synthetic equivalent for COOH-?  Just because there is a similar carbanion? I understand that they get there in two steps (first the NaCN and then adding H20), but that really doesn't make CN- a synthetic equivalent unless you add the part about adding H20 correct? Unless I'm missing something.  Wouldn't a synthetic equivalent be more like NaCOOH? instead of CN- and then H20?
Is there a good source on being able to identify synthetic equivalents anywhere?

Offline agrobert

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 629
  • Mole Snacks: +69/-17
  • Gender: Male
  • diels alder
Re: Synthetic equivalents
« Reply #1 on: December 17, 2007, 04:07:32 PM »
Synthetic equivalents have similar chemistry.  Which is why CN- and COOH- are considered equivalent.  It has to do with the environment of the carbon, the overall charge and the number/types of bonds made to heteroatoms.  Think about carbonyls, semiacetals and hemiacetals.  How are they considered equivalent. (reversibility???)
In the realm of scientific observation, luck is only granted to those who are prepared. -Louis Pasteur

Offline Dan

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4716
  • Mole Snacks: +469/-72
  • Gender: Male
  • Organic Chemist
    • My research
Re: Synthetic equivalents
« Reply #2 on: December 17, 2007, 05:07:55 PM »
Wouldn't a synthetic equivalent be more like NaCOOH? instead of CN- and then H20?

No because NaCOOH cannot exist as it would react with itsself to form HCOONa (sodium formate) and thus will not be a carbon nucleophile.
My research: Google Scholar and Researchgate

Offline minimal

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 83
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-0
Re: Synthetic equivalents
« Reply #3 on: December 18, 2007, 11:22:21 AM »
Great, thanks for the info, do you guys know of some resources (online preferably, but all will do), where I can check out some more information on synthetic equivalents?

Offline agrobert

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 629
  • Mole Snacks: +69/-17
  • Gender: Male
  • diels alder
In the realm of scientific observation, luck is only granted to those who are prepared. -Louis Pasteur

Sponsored Links