There is a difference between complete freedom and freedom that is not against the basic laws...
Basic law is due what it takes to survive and what you want. That is how the animal kingdom works.
This other concept of killing other humans is wrong are "stupid restrictions" from church, morals and society. Your words.
I want to evolve to survive and I want what I want, and not these stupid morals based off of religion. And I am also a scientists. Therefor based on what you have said if my experiment kills you, so be it, it is cool.
The whole point of my discourse is to illustrate the fact that there are many scientific endeavors that go against "the church" that you would be completely against if it directly effects you. There there are people in this world who do things in science not for the betterment of mankind and knowledge, but out of greed and lust for power.
You may want to allow scientists to do whatever they want. Fine. That is your choice. I wish our society was at a point ready for that. We are not. When any scientists anywhere in the world does something that effects your, or you do not like, you forfeit all your rights to complain; this includes something as little as complaining of poor gas millage of a certain car. It took a lot of smart people to design that horribly fuel inefficient new giant SUV.