September 28, 2024, 07:06:24 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: electromagnetic radiation question..  (Read 3424 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline raffster2

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 11
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
electromagnetic radiation question..
« on: December 07, 2008, 01:08:45 AM »
The problem asks whether the velocity of electrons emitted from an Na photocell would increase or decrease if the wavelength of the emitted light went from 435 (wavelength of indigo) to 405 (wavelength of Violet).

Since the wavelength decreases, the frequency increases, which would make the E in E=hv decrease, therefore decreasing the velocity. Is this right? Because the solution says Ek indigo < Ek Violet.

Offline Astrokel

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 989
  • Mole Snacks: +65/-10
  • Gender: Male
Re: electromagnetic radiation question..
« Reply #1 on: December 07, 2008, 01:28:08 AM »
Quote
Since the wavelength decreases, the frequency increases, which would make the E in E=hv decrease,
v is frequency, it increases as wavelength decreases so E should increase.
No matters what results are waiting for us, it's nothing but the DESTINY!!!!!!!!!!!!

Offline raffster2

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 11
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: electromagnetic radiation question..
« Reply #2 on: December 07, 2008, 02:52:16 AM »
Ohh. okay I think i understand.  The reason why I was confused is because it's a multiple part question, and the previous part had the wavefunction in the equation, so i subtracted hv from E, instead of dividing by v.  Since they were both electrons of Na, the wavefunction is the same, so it is omitted from the equation and it's only E=hv.  Is that right?

Offline Astrokel

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 989
  • Mole Snacks: +65/-10
  • Gender: Male
Re: electromagnetic radiation question..
« Reply #3 on: December 07, 2008, 03:10:31 AM »
Quote
so i subtracted hv from E, instead of dividing by v
Eh  ??? Do you mean from Einstein's photoelectric equation?
No matters what results are waiting for us, it's nothing but the DESTINY!!!!!!!!!!!!

Offline raffster2

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 11
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: electromagnetic radiation question..
« Reply #4 on: December 07, 2008, 01:02:15 PM »
work function, i mean, the thing with a phi

Offline Astrokel

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 989
  • Mole Snacks: +65/-10
  • Gender: Male
Re: electromagnetic radiation question..
« Reply #5 on: December 07, 2008, 02:58:34 PM »
Sorry, i don't quite get you. I understand what a wavefunction is but i do not know what you meant by omitted from the equation. What equation? Photoelectric equation? Or perhaps if you really need help you can post the whole question here.
No matters what results are waiting for us, it's nothing but the DESTINY!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sponsored Links