Chemical Forums
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
December 23, 2024, 12:30:30 PM
Forum Rules
: Read This Before Posting
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
Chemical Forums
Chemistry Forums for Students
Organic Chemistry Forum
Why is aminobenzene less basic than cyclohexylamine?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Topic: Why is aminobenzene less basic than cyclohexylamine? (Read 3230 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
derek0o0
Regular Member
Posts: 48
Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Why is aminobenzene less basic than cyclohexylamine?
«
on:
February 12, 2009, 03:05:33 PM »
Why is aminobenzene less basic than cyclohexylamine?
It must be soemthing do with the benzene ring which the electrons are delocalised into it
But how can I explain this?
Logged
macman104
Retired Staff
Sr. Member
Posts: 1644
Mole Snacks: +168/-26
Gender:
Re: Why is aminobenzene less basic than cyclohexylamine?
«
Reply #1 on:
February 12, 2009, 03:52:31 PM »
That is exactly why. The lone pair, which the nitrogen uses to attract a proton is delocalized into the ring system. It has less "lone-pair character" you might say, so it behaves less like a base.
Side note, I'm gonna move this over to organic chem
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Sponsored Links
Chemical Forums
Chemistry Forums for Students
Organic Chemistry Forum
Why is aminobenzene less basic than cyclohexylamine?