November 26, 2024, 03:29:11 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Molecular explanations for heat capacities of metals  (Read 3635 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline student8607

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 227
  • Mole Snacks: +2/-3
Molecular explanations for heat capacities of metals
« on: March 19, 2009, 04:50:53 PM »
In lab we tested the heat capacities of aluminium, tin, copper and lead



Now we are asked to make molecular level explanations.

Any ideas?

Offline Arkcon

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7367
  • Mole Snacks: +533/-147
Re: Molecular explanations for heat capacities of metals
« Reply #1 on: March 19, 2009, 05:52:59 PM »
How do they differ from one another, on the atomic and molecular (if that actually applies to a pure metal) level?  What sort of differences do bulk pure materials have from one another?
Hey, I'm not judging.  I just like to shoot straight.  I'm a man of science.

Offline student8607

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 227
  • Mole Snacks: +2/-3
Re: Molecular explanations for heat capacities of metals
« Reply #2 on: March 19, 2009, 06:15:55 PM »
How do they differ from one another, on the atomic and molecular (if that actually applies to a pure metal) level?  What sort of differences do bulk pure materials have from one another?
Are you thinking something like mass or the number of protons?

Or something more?

Offline Arkcon

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7367
  • Mole Snacks: +533/-147
Re: Molecular explanations for heat capacities of metals
« Reply #3 on: March 19, 2009, 06:24:40 PM »
No, I wasn't really going for protons, 'tho you should consider molecular mass.  There is also another bulk property of each metal worth considering.
Hey, I'm not judging.  I just like to shoot straight.  I'm a man of science.

Offline student8607

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 227
  • Mole Snacks: +2/-3
Re: Molecular explanations for heat capacities of metals
« Reply #4 on: March 20, 2009, 07:15:52 AM »
No, I wasn't really going for protons, 'tho you should consider molecular mass.  There is also another bulk property of each metal worth considering.
Ok, I took care of mass.

How about charge?
Density?
Atomic radius?

Sponsored Links