September 23, 2024, 02:30:45 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Bond order  (Read 4738 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Ashutosh

  • Guest
Bond order
« on: April 09, 2005, 05:11:46 AM »
what is the defination of bond order ???
 I know two formulae for calculating bond order.
1. bond order=1/2(bonding electrons-antibonding electrons)
                         AND
2. bond order=number of bonds in the molecule/number of resonating structures
    Are these two bond ordere same ???
    Do we get same bond order by using these formulae for the same molecule ???please explain with suitable example.
    what is the use of calculating bond order ???
    I know if bond order zero or negative then the molecule is unstable.But I think antibonding electrons cant exced bonding electrons.If yes give me a suitable example and explain.
    If yes,explain the unstability of CH(OH)3 on this basis.
    thanks for helping.

Offline Donaldson Tan

  • Editor, New Asia Republic
  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3177
  • Mole Snacks: +261/-13
  • Gender: Male
    • New Asia Republic
Re:Bond order
« Reply #1 on: April 09, 2005, 05:54:42 AM »
the first definition is with regards to MO theory while the 2nd definition holds its regards to the valence bond theory. both are valid with respect to their originating theory.

a more modern definition of bond order will follow the MO theory definition because it encompasses quantum theory and it actually agrees with experimental results.
"Say you're in a [chemical] plant and there's a snake on the floor. What are you going to do? Call a consultant? Get a meeting together to talk about which color is the snake? Employees should do one thing: walk over there and you step on the friggin� snake." - Jean-Pierre Garnier, CEO of Glaxosmithkline, June 2006

pck24

  • Guest
Re:Bond order
« Reply #2 on: May 23, 2005, 07:50:14 PM »
Although the MO approach does oversimplify the energy levels of the bonding and antibonding orbitals, in assuming that the energy penalty on filling an antibonding orbital exactly counters the energy reduction in filling the bonding.  If we use the simple "(number of electrons in bonding-number in antibonding)/2" we do not account for this.

Sponsored Links