December 22, 2024, 10:22:42 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Nobel Prize  (Read 5170 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline University_Of_Toronto

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 33
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-13
Nobel Prize
« on: October 15, 2009, 12:44:56 PM »
I am aware that these fields’ physics, physiology and medicine are recognized by the Nobel Prize committee, so

Why is there no Nobel Prize for Biology?

Offline Borek

  • Mr. pH
  • Administrator
  • Deity Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27885
  • Mole Snacks: +1815/-412
  • Gender: Male
  • I am known to be occasionally wrong.
    • Chembuddy
Re: Nobel Prize
« Reply #1 on: October 15, 2009, 01:51:54 PM »
From Alfred Nobel will:

Quote
The said interest shall be divided into five equal parts, which shall be apportioned as follows: one part to the person who shall have made the most important discovery or invention within the field of physics; one part to the person who shall have made the most important chemical discovery or improvement; one part to the person who shall have made the most important discovery within the domain of physiology or medicine; one part to the person who shall have produced in the field of literature the most outstanding work of an idealistic tendency; and one part to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity among nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.
ChemBuddy chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation, titrations.info

Offline University_Of_Toronto

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 33
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-13
Re: Nobel Prize
« Reply #2 on: October 15, 2009, 01:56:02 PM »

Ah Alfred Nobel was not a biology man...he didnt include it in his will ;D

Offline renge ishyo

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 403
  • Mole Snacks: +67/-14
Re: Nobel Prize
« Reply #3 on: October 15, 2009, 02:28:30 PM »
At the time that Alfred Nobel wrote his will in 1895, biology was a very young science and its major contributions to society were through physiology and medicine. I'm sure he felt that these two areas covered all the useful advancements in the life sciences at the time (I mean would you want to be less specific and have your money go to the eugenics movement that was popular in biology at the time?). The subject of modern genetics & molecular biology didn't really start until the early 1900s with the rediscovery of Mendel, and that was after the Nobel Prize was established.

In fact, the problem of "what area to give molecular biologists a Nobel Prize in" has been there from the beginning as the Nobel Prize in 1907 was given to Eduard Buchner for isolating the first enzymes from a yeast extraction. They really couldn't give him a Nobel Prize in medicine or physiology for that, so they ended up just giving him the Nobel Prize in chemistry. Much to the dismay of inorganic chemists, this trend of giving out molecular biology awards under the Nobel Prize for "chemistry" continues to this day...in fact, every year I see chemists complaining about how the biologists are always getting the nobel prize for chemistry.
« Last Edit: October 15, 2009, 02:40:15 PM by renge ishyo »

Sponsored Links