November 28, 2024, 02:58:23 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Stereoselectivity of epoxide ring openings  (Read 3969 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kayenta

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 3
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Stereoselectivity of epoxide ring openings
« on: May 22, 2010, 11:48:15 AM »
Hi everyone, my first post here.

I was hoping someone could briefly outline the stereoselectivity of epoxide ring openings, specifically if you are opening cyclohexene oxide under acidic conditions with a weak nucleophile (EtOH), what would be the stereochemistry of the product (ie cis or trans-2-ethoxycyclohexanol) and why?

Thanks in advance.

Offline OC pro

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 396
  • Mole Snacks: +36/-15
  • Gender: Male
Re: Stereoselectivity of epoxide ring openings
« Reply #1 on: May 22, 2010, 12:14:52 PM »
Any ideas yourself?

Offline kayenta

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 3
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Stereoselectivity of epoxide ring openings
« Reply #2 on: May 22, 2010, 12:37:07 PM »
Well, my instinct that the alcohol will attack from below the epoxide ring to form the trans product, but I'm not sure.

Also, would the stereoselectivity be different if the ring is opened by a good nucleophile without acid catalyst?

Offline OC pro

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 396
  • Mole Snacks: +36/-15
  • Gender: Male
Re: Stereoselectivity of epoxide ring openings
« Reply #3 on: May 22, 2010, 12:49:21 PM »
Your instinct is right. Strong nucleophiles will attack from the back side via Sn2. Weak nucleophiles need acid catalysis via Sn1. This also gives trans products, but the regiochemistry can be different.

Offline kayenta

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 3
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Stereoselectivity of epoxide ring openings
« Reply #4 on: May 22, 2010, 01:11:11 PM »
Cool, thanks!

Sponsored Links