December 29, 2024, 12:50:36 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Polarimetry  (Read 3067 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Chepsy

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Polarimetry
« on: November 12, 2010, 09:39:29 PM »
In trying to determine the identity of an unknown aldose using polarimetry and melting points, I have conflicting data (the specific rotation and melting point do not correspond to one sugar).  What is going on?  Would you trust the specific rotation over the melting point?  I don't see how the melting point could be inaccurate...?

Offline MissPhosgene

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 364
  • Mole Snacks: +23/-5
  • Gender: Female
Re: Polarimetry
« Reply #1 on: November 13, 2010, 12:10:06 AM »
You may have a mixture of the closed and open form. With that comes a and b anomers. You could try doing an equilibration. The Keq should be well documented, and with that you can take a second look at polarimetry and mp.
Stereograms of the 32 crystallographic point groups: little bike wheels of cold, hard, pure rationality.

Offline Borek

  • Mr. pH
  • Administrator
  • Deity Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27890
  • Mole Snacks: +1816/-412
  • Gender: Male
  • I am known to be occasionally wrong.
    • Chembuddy
Re: Polarimetry
« Reply #2 on: November 13, 2010, 03:18:18 AM »
I don't see how the melting point could be inaccurate...?

Melting points are accurate only for very pure substances.
ChemBuddy chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation, titrations.info

Offline Chepsy

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Polarimetry
« Reply #3 on: November 14, 2010, 01:29:33 PM »
Yes, but the sample was supposedly a pure substance.

Thanks to both of you.

Sponsored Links