July 03, 2024, 07:53:21 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Mass spec relative abundances  (Read 2934 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline cabaal

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 57
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-0
Mass spec relative abundances
« on: January 27, 2011, 07:27:22 PM »
"The mass spec of (CH3)4Si has a base peak at m/z=73. Calculate the relative abundance of the isotopic peaks at m/z=74 & m/z=75."

Isotopes are from 29Si and 30Si with the base peak being 28Si. There is also 12C and 13C.

Relative abundance is # of atoms * natural abundance of isotope 1/natural abundance of isotope 2.

m/z 74 = 1 Si atom * (29Si abundance)/(28Si abundance) = 1 * 0.0467/0.9221 * 100% = 5.06%. I understand this.
m/z 75 = 1 Si atom * (30Si abundance)/(28Si abundance) = 1 * 0.0310/0.9221 * 100% = 3.36%. I understand this.

(CH3)4Si = 88 g/mol - 74 m/z ratio (presumably unit charge) = 15 mass unit loss (e.g., 1 CH3.) This implies that there are 3 remaining methane groups, and consequently 3 isotopes (13CH3.) I understand this.

The solutions manual gives a calculation that I don't understand:

3 C atoms * (13C abundance)/(28Si abundance) = 3 * 0.011/0.9221 * 100% = 3.61%

Why am I dividing by the relative abundance of 28Si? Why am I not dividing by the relative abundance of 12C?

It also says "the contribution of 13C to the m/z=75 peak is negligible." Why?

Offline MOTOBALL

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 372
  • Mole Snacks: +50/-5
Re: Mass spec relative abundances
« Reply #1 on: January 29, 2011, 04:16:04 PM »
Your third line,

RA is # of atoms *natural abundance of isotope 1/nat. abund. of isotope 2

is true only for a single atom of the element.

In general case, the theoretical RA values are derived from probability theory, and are of the form
of the binomial expansion,

(a + b) to the nth power, where a is nat. abund. of isotope 1
                                            b ..  2

and n is the number of atoms of that element.

For example, 35Cl = about 72 % RA, and 37Cl = about 24 % RA (numbers approximated to make the calculation more obvious)

For Cl2, a = 0.72, b = 0.24, n = 2
So, (a + b) squared = a sqd + 2ab + b sqd = ratio is 0.5184:0.3360:0.0576

= 9:6:1 approximately

Here, n = 1 for Si but n = 3 for C, and n = 9 for H.

m/z 73 = (CH3)3Si, so m/z 75 = 12C3 1H9 30Si, RA = 3.36 %
                 and also m/z 75 = 13C2 12C1 1H9 28Si
ratio = (a + b) cubed, where a = 98.90, b = 1.10 % and n = 3 C atoms.[see calc. below]

You can see that the 13C3 contribution (0.00014%) IS negligible compared to the 30Si contribution (3.36%).

for m/z 74 = 29Si gives 5.06 % RA
and also m/z 74 = 13C1 12C2 1H9 28Si, (a + b) to nth power gives
(a cubed )+ (3* a sqd *b )+ (3 * b sqd * a) + (b cubed), since n = 3 C atoms
a = 98.9%, b = 1.10%

so ratio m/z 73:74:75 is 967362:32278 + 359:1.331  =  100:3.37:0.00014.

These probabilities are independent of each other, so are additive.

So if m/z 73 =100 % (base peak),

then m/z 74 = 5.06 for 29Si + 3.37 for the 13C1 12C2 = 8.43%.

The calculation given by the solutions manual is I believe INCORRECT, since the natural relative  abundances of the elements, and therefore the probabiliites of occurrence, are independent of each other.

Your calculation for 30Si = 3.36% should be correct.

It has been quite a few yrs since I have had to grind this out, line by line, so have someone else check it.






Sponsored Links