December 26, 2024, 01:37:30 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Calorimetry question  (Read 3117 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline hvard78

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Calorimetry question
« on: March 22, 2011, 09:57:45 PM »
10.0 of substance x is dissolved in 100.0 g of water in a calorimeter with a heat capacity of 127 J/C. The temperature changes from 20.0 C to 3.1 C. Is the salvation process exothermic or endothermic? How much thermal energy per gram of substance X is released (absorbed) by the process?


I know this reaction is exothermic because the change in temperature (Tf-Ti) is negative.

so the equation is (tell me if I'm wrong, thank you!)
qcalorimeter + qwater + qprocess= 0
so I know qwater= ms :delta:T= 100.0g(4.184 J/gC)(3.1-20.0)

But...now I am stuck. Can someone please help me? Thanks a lot!

Offline opti384

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 434
  • Mole Snacks: +33/-25
  • Gender: Male
    • In the Search for the Laws of Nature
Re: Calorimetry question
« Reply #1 on: March 23, 2011, 02:03:39 AM »
Quote
I know this reaction is exothermic because the change in temperature (Tf-Ti) is negative


Are you sure?

Offline hvard78

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Calorimetry question
« Reply #2 on: March 24, 2011, 03:59:18 PM »
If the temperature went from a higher temperature to a lower temperature, isn't the change in temperature negative?

Offline opti384

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 434
  • Mole Snacks: +33/-25
  • Gender: Male
    • In the Search for the Laws of Nature
Re: Calorimetry question
« Reply #3 on: March 24, 2011, 08:40:14 PM »
This reaction will be an endothermic reaction because it absorbed heat from the surrounding and therefore the temperature decreased.

Offline KyleH

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14
  • Mole Snacks: +2/-0
Re: Calorimetry question
« Reply #4 on: April 13, 2011, 10:31:10 PM »
to elaborate on opti's answer:  The surroundings (water and whatever else you had in your total Q equation) had a negative change in energy indicating that it's an exothermic reaction like initially thought.  However, something had to of 'taken' (absorbed) that energy from the water.  This would have ended up being the substance, making the reaction actually endothermic.

Remember that:                        Qsurroundings = -Qsystem

In other words, when one things loses energy (Q), then another must have gained the energy.  Since you solved for Q and got a negative answer for the surroundings, that means that the systems actually ended up absorbing that energy. 

I hope this helped

Sponsored Links