1. Unfortunately your formula is wrong; C6H16O1N0 (element symbols are ALWAYS in caps) requires [6 + 1] + [0 - 16]/2 = -1 double bond equivalents, which is nonsensical.
2. There are some issues with the mass spectrum. If m/z 103-5 is the molecular ion cluster, then m/z 94 is not real (i.e. is background); if m/z 94 is real, then m/z 103-5 is background OR the spectrum is a composite of two compounds. Your prof. has either deliberately, or unknowingly, given you a curve-ball.
3. I recognize the spectrum as probably due to a well-known molecule, MW 94 Da; ignore the m/z 103-5 cluster !!
Good Luck.