January 10, 2025, 03:27:23 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Radical halogenation vs alkene halogenation  (Read 2648 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline spice1510

  • Very New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Radical halogenation vs alkene halogenation
« on: November 21, 2011, 08:29:24 PM »
This may be one of the most simple obvious answers but since I'm one to overcomplicate; I'm missing something.

An alkene - reacted with NBS and light in a CCl4 solvent --? major product is a bromo-alkene

 but a cycloalkene, reacted with Cl2 in CCl4 solvent to produce a 1,2-dihalocycloalkane? 

I am trying to work the problems in the online homework and I keep getting it wrong.  I can see "both ways" but why is it, without instructing you otherwise, requiring you to use one method over the other?

I thought it may be NBS...indicative more towards radical rxns but would there be a reason Cl2 explicitly wasn't?

Thank you :)

Offline fledarmus

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1675
  • Mole Snacks: +203/-28
Re: Radical halogenation vs alkene halogenation
« Reply #1 on: November 21, 2011, 09:04:38 PM »
You just need to develop a feel for the reactivity of your compounds. Alkenes react rapidly with molecular chlorine and molecular bromine by 1,2-addition reactions. Unless you provide the halogens as radicals, you probably won't get the radical reaction.

N-bromosuccinimide is one way of providing bromine radicals, with light to activate it. This reagent does not undergo the addition reaction that molecular bromine does.

If there are no alkenes or alkynes, you can get radical additions from molecular chlorine or bromine by using light to break the halogen-halogen bond. This is a much slower reaction than the addition reaction, though, so if there are any alkenes or alkynes, they will react first.

Sponsored Links