November 29, 2024, 05:49:42 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: influence of cyclopropyl group on stability of carbocation  (Read 7058 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline furaniki18

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 35
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
influence of cyclopropyl group on stability of carbocation
« on: January 02, 2012, 09:35:11 AM »
my teacher gave us this particular order of stability of carbocations but did not explain why it is so...i am not able to think of any possible effect that could be stronger than resonance...has it got something to do with ring expansion? i am just confused can somebody help..

Offline CaverKat

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 32
  • Mole Snacks: +2/-0
Re: influence of cyclopropyl group on stability of carbocation
« Reply #1 on: January 02, 2012, 09:46:27 AM »
Hmm.  I would have thought the Ph3C+ carbocation to be the most stable (isolatable as well, I think).

Order looks like it's decreasing, then increased then decreasing again.

Ah.  I think it's two separate orders.

The first describes the decreasing stability as you go from tertiary to primary substituted (inductive effects).

The second list is decreasing stability of conjugated carbocations, with cyclic being the highest (not sure why, but cyclic things tend to be happier).  The decreasing as you go from Ph3 to 2 to Ph, is definitely the reduced number of resonance forms - decreasing delocalisation, stabilisation.

Offline furaniki18

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 35
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: influence of cyclopropyl group on stability of carbocation
« Reply #2 on: January 02, 2012, 09:57:14 AM »
no it's one complete list...i can say this for sure because in many questions in my assignment i had to choose between a cyclopropyl substituted carbocation and the one substituted with phenyl and answers to all of those ques. indicate that cyclopropyl substituted carbocation has greater stability than the one substituted with phenyl...

Offline CaverKat

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 32
  • Mole Snacks: +2/-0
Re: influence of cyclopropyl group on stability of carbocation
« Reply #3 on: January 02, 2012, 10:00:46 AM »
Ok.  I'm stumped.  Sorry  :-\

Offline Telamond

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 110
  • Mole Snacks: +6/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: influence of cyclopropyl group on stability of carbocation
« Reply #4 on: January 02, 2012, 10:07:08 AM »
This is similiar to your other question, which is also about carbocation stability. Guess your professor has gone through hyperconjugation and all that stuff?

Can you rougly sketch how the carbocation is stabilized in the first structure (with three isopropyl groups) vs. for an example a tertiary carbocation which is stabilized by three sigma C-H bonds?

Offline furaniki18

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 35
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: influence of cyclopropyl group on stability of carbocation
« Reply #5 on: January 02, 2012, 10:17:11 AM »
no i cannot...i'd really appreciate if you could help..

Offline Telamond

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 110
  • Mole Snacks: +6/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: influence of cyclopropyl group on stability of carbocation
« Reply #6 on: January 02, 2012, 10:27:46 AM »
This is how they stabilize the carbocations. Also the steric strains from these are excellent as they "point" the orbitals in the right direction. Compare this to how it'd look like if the cyclopropyl group was a cyclohexyl or two alkyl chains. The most stable conformation wouldn't have been like the one I drew.

Offline furaniki18

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 35
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: influence of cyclopropyl group on stability of carbocation
« Reply #7 on: January 02, 2012, 10:33:24 AM »
i'm getting what you are trying to explain..thanks :)...do you have any link where i can read about this thing in detail?

Offline Telamond

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 110
  • Mole Snacks: +6/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: influence of cyclopropyl group on stability of carbocation
« Reply #8 on: January 02, 2012, 01:44:26 PM »
Sorry, I remember this from a lecture hand-outs, not from a coursebook.

Sponsored Links