I am not wishing to repeat the acidity arguments here. I was simply suggesting that if one were to try to explain why hydrogen atoms may be removed to form a conjugate base, that one should create a general model for acidity. Why should perchloric acid have a different rationale for ionization than HBr? I was arguing or asking, "How are the electrons of HBr different than those of perchloric acid?" Although it is expedient to argue as Babcock_Hall has,
…my suggestion that the more oxygen atoms are present, the more spread out is the negative charge, making it more stable.
I found it difficult to rationalize how resonance participation should to lead to an increase in acidity. My focus was on the H-X bond. I could understand that if electrons were pulled toward the X-atom, they would be pulled away from the proton and acidity should increase. I would argue this is the kind of effect one should find for a comparison of HOH and HOCl. Replacing a proton with a chlorine should pull electrons away from the oxygen and the O-H bond. Doing so, increases the proton-electron pair distance and acidity.
It could be possible to pull electrons away in a hyperconjugation way. Therefore I suggested pyrrole. In pyrrole, the electrons of the nitrogen are part of the aromatic ring by resonance. The NH acidity is still much higher than an isolated amine. Deprotonation of pyrrole left the N-H electrons attached to the nitrogen, but orthogonal to the pi electrons that are part of the aromatic ring. I was arguing that an increase in acidity was not a resonance effect, but rather an inductive effect, that is just as replacing a proton with a chlorine increased the acidity of HOCl.
I think I received about ten flags for this, so this idea was not popular.