I resisted answering because the answer is paradoxical (or wrong).
Q: Why is carbocation stability mentioned in a separate chapter than electronegativity?
A: Is it to avoid students saying, "I thought carbon was more electron withdrawing than hydrogen?"
Obviously, if your textbook stated hydrogen is more electron withdrawing than carbon, this would be an easy question. Let's look at it differently. Tertiary butanol is the less acidic than methanol. What would you conclude about the electron withdrawing properties of carbon and hydrogen? Let me add more data, acetic acid (pKa 4.75) is less acidic than formic acid (pKa 3.75). You could look at the pKa's of substituted benzoic acids, phenols, anilines, the Hammett sigma values, etc. If you did, you would conclude carbon is a better electron donor than hydrogen. Let me repeat that hydrogen is more electron withdrawing than carbon.
My paper on explaining the energy differences that let to the electronegativity scale has been accepted to the Fall ACS Meeting in Philadelphia (link not available yet). Oh, and why electronegativity gives you the wrong answer.