December 15, 2024, 07:01:04 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: major product question  (Read 5704 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mango10

  • Guest
major product question
« on: December 13, 2005, 03:46:58 PM »
i am having difficulty trying to figure out if my answer is right. I was wondering if anyone can help me out.

question: the addition of H20 to 2-methylcyclohexene will form as what  major product?

my answer: i cant draw the benzoic structure but picture that with  an OH on the 3rd and CH3 on the 4th. Did i do it correctly. thanks

mango10

  • Guest
Re:major product question
« Reply #1 on: December 13, 2005, 03:52:39 PM »
also i am not sure how to answer this question:

the hydration of 2-methyl-2-hexene will give as the major product?

thanks guys!

Offline Yggdrasil

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3215
  • Mole Snacks: +485/-21
  • Gender: Male
  • Physical Biochemist
Re:major product question
« Reply #2 on: December 13, 2005, 07:08:28 PM »
When an alkene is reacted with aqueous acid, a carbocation intermediate is generated.  You need to decide which carbon forms the carbocation (hint: look up Markovnikov's rule).

Offline BelarusGirl

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 16
  • Mole Snacks: +2/-2
  • Gender: Female
  • I'm from Belarus!:)
Re:major product question
« Reply #3 on: December 14, 2005, 03:52:37 PM »
According to Markovnikov hydration of 2-methylcyclohexene will give 2-methyl-2-cyclohexanol,
and hydration of 2-methyl-2-hexene will give 2-methyl-2-hexanol.  8)

Offline BelarusGirl

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 16
  • Mole Snacks: +2/-2
  • Gender: Female
  • I'm from Belarus!:)
Re:major product question
« Reply #4 on: December 14, 2005, 03:54:05 PM »
If I'm wrong? tell me please :)

Offline pantone159

  • Mole Herder
  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 492
  • Mole Snacks: +54/-6
  • Gender: Male
  • A mole of moles doesn't smell so nice...
    • Go Texas Soccer!!
Re:major product question
« Reply #5 on: December 14, 2005, 06:14:17 PM »
BTW - Why isn't the original compound named 1-methylcyclohexene?

The double bond will be between positions 1 and 2, by convention, and you would choose the numbering so that the substituent (methyl) is at the lower position, namely 1.  Therefore, 1-methylcyclohexene.

Unless I misunderstand the correct naming conventions...

Sponsored Links