November 25, 2024, 09:59:33 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Schroedinger's ''cat''  (Read 8587 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

crow_of_darkness

  • Guest
Schroedinger's ''cat''
« on: January 22, 2006, 08:09:25 AM »
  The essense of the problem is that Photons and electrons,behaves as small participles and waves too, according the experiment.Bohrs theory was: Electron is a participle but we have to avoid every efford for detailed description of its track.The only thing we can say, its that this can be described from a ''wave-connection''(Mathematic connection) The squere of the wave-connection, is at one point the possibility to find an entity.
    Well, we can say that electron is everywere, until the measure finish. After that the wave-connection collapses and the electron is a small participle with a known possition.
    Austrian physic Erwin Staidinger invented an intelligible experiment for make ridiculus Bors theory. The experiment ''demants'' a vase with a cover and a radioactive substance.From there it can be a trasmission of a small particle. This particle will activate a searching machine, so nerve gas will be free. A cat is puted inside the vase(We dont know why he choosed a cat). After some time, there is 50% possibility to be transmission of the small particle. An observer, looks the vase, for see what will happens to the cat.According to Bohr, cat is not alive and also not dead, until the wave-connection of the observer abolished(when he 'll open the cover for see what happened to the cat). Many conversations happened for this experiment.
    In reality, the mistake of this efford, was the wrong application of the word ''observer''. Observation doesnt need to include only one person. ;) In Bohrs theory, its very important the action of measure. The point that the wave-connection abolished, is the point that the small particle influenses with the searching machin and inversely. After that there is no way out for the cat.
« Last Edit: February 01, 2006, 08:34:31 PM by geodome »

Offline Borek

  • Mr. pH
  • Administrator
  • Deity Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27862
  • Mole Snacks: +1813/-412
  • Gender: Male
  • I am known to be occasionally wrong.
    • Chembuddy
Re:Staidingers ''cat''
« Reply #1 on: January 22, 2006, 08:37:42 AM »
I know that English is your second language, but you should at least check spelling of the names before posting.
ChemBuddy chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation, titrations.info

Offline plu

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 193
  • Mole Snacks: +15/-7
  • Gender: Male
Re:Staidingers ''cat''
« Reply #2 on: January 29, 2006, 11:17:11 AM »
I believe it's "Schrodinger", mate  :P

Offline Borek

  • Mr. pH
  • Administrator
  • Deity Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27862
  • Mole Snacks: +1813/-412
  • Gender: Male
  • I am known to be occasionally wrong.
    • Chembuddy
Re:Staidingers ''cat''
« Reply #3 on: January 29, 2006, 01:20:23 PM »
Schrödinger or Schroedinger to be precise.
ChemBuddy chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation, titrations.info

crow_of_darkness

  • Guest
Re:Staidingers ''cat''
« Reply #4 on: January 29, 2006, 03:41:10 PM »
    I believe that the content of my post has bigger value from a name...

Offline Borek

  • Mr. pH
  • Administrator
  • Deity Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27862
  • Mole Snacks: +1813/-412
  • Gender: Male
  • I am known to be occasionally wrong.
    • Chembuddy
Re:Staidingers ''cat''
« Reply #5 on: January 29, 2006, 03:50:46 PM »
Please read forum rules - they explicitly state that you should spell check your posts.
ChemBuddy chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation, titrations.info

Offline Donaldson Tan

  • Editor, New Asia Republic
  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3177
  • Mole Snacks: +261/-13
  • Gender: Male
    • New Asia Republic
Re:Schroedinger's ''cat''
« Reply #6 on: February 01, 2006, 08:44:38 PM »
the spelling in the threadstarter's post is really horrible.

anyway. the schrondinger's cat is also known as the observer's paradox.
"Say you're in a [chemical] plant and there's a snake on the floor. What are you going to do? Call a consultant? Get a meeting together to talk about which color is the snake? Employees should do one thing: walk over there and you step on the friggin� snake." - Jean-Pierre Garnier, CEO of Glaxosmithkline, June 2006

Sponsored Links