December 22, 2024, 09:54:09 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Minor of minor changes to the periodic table  (Read 11232 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mitch

  • General Chemist
  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5298
  • Mole Snacks: +376/-3
  • Gender: Male
  • "I bring you peace." -Mr. Burns
    • Chemistry Blog
Minor of minor changes to the periodic table
« on: December 22, 2005, 12:32:49 AM »
The file names such as H.jpg have been changed to Hydrogen.jpg for better indexing on search engines.
Most Common Suggestions I Make on the Forums.
1. Start by writing a balanced chemical equation.
2. Don't confuse thermodynamic stability with chemical reactivity.
3. Forum Supports LaTex

Offline jdurg

  • Banninator
  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1366
  • Mole Snacks: +106/-23
  • Gender: Male
  • I am NOT a freak.
Re:Minor of minor changes to the periodic table
« Reply #1 on: December 22, 2005, 11:37:33 PM »
Phew.  I first read this message and thought "Oh dear god, now I have to go rename all of the images I've uploaded here".  I now see that you've already taken care of it Mitch.   ;D
"A real fart is beefy, has a density greater than or equal to the air surrounding it, consists

Offline jdurg

  • Banninator
  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1366
  • Mole Snacks: +106/-23
  • Gender: Male
  • I am NOT a freak.
Re:Minor of minor changes to the periodic table
« Reply #2 on: December 22, 2005, 11:39:31 PM »
Just wondering one thing;  Why were elements >Roentgenium removed?  Just curious about it.  I know some haven't been officially verified, but the ones I had pictures of had been verified to exist at some point.  
"A real fart is beefy, has a density greater than or equal to the air surrounding it, consists

Offline Mitch

  • General Chemist
  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5298
  • Mole Snacks: +376/-3
  • Gender: Male
  • "I bring you peace." -Mr. Burns
    • Chemistry Blog
Re:Minor of minor changes to the periodic table
« Reply #3 on: December 23, 2005, 12:33:05 AM »
The evidence for those elements are not as strong as they are for 112 and 113. So, I left them. The others are going to have to wait until there is stronger evidence that they were made.
Most Common Suggestions I Make on the Forums.
1. Start by writing a balanced chemical equation.
2. Don't confuse thermodynamic stability with chemical reactivity.
3. Forum Supports LaTex

Offline jdurg

  • Banninator
  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1366
  • Mole Snacks: +106/-23
  • Gender: Male
  • I am NOT a freak.
Re:Minor of minor changes to the periodic table
« Reply #4 on: December 23, 2005, 07:57:16 PM »
Okay, then you may want to add Uub and Uut back to the table as they are currently not present.   ;D
"A real fart is beefy, has a density greater than or equal to the air surrounding it, consists

Offline Mitch

  • General Chemist
  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5298
  • Mole Snacks: +376/-3
  • Gender: Male
  • "I bring you peace." -Mr. Burns
    • Chemistry Blog
Re:Minor of minor changes to the periodic table
« Reply #5 on: December 23, 2005, 08:59:46 PM »
No one in the field calls it UUB or UUT though. Everyone calls it 112 and 113. Even Glenn Seaborg thought Iupac was stupid to make up that nomenclature, becuase no one in the field would ever adopt it. Thus, we won't either.
Most Common Suggestions I Make on the Forums.
1. Start by writing a balanced chemical equation.
2. Don't confuse thermodynamic stability with chemical reactivity.
3. Forum Supports LaTex

Sponsored Links