January 11, 2025, 09:50:59 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Retrosynthesis Problem  (Read 2362 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline luenne

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 3
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Retrosynthesis Problem
« on: December 24, 2012, 09:20:45 AM »
I want to do the Retrosynthesis plan for the following 2 compounds. The left part of the two compounds is relatively similar so I thought I would start on that. I am using Reaxys. But so far no luck. Does anyone know which part would be an obvious choice to start on?

Offline discodermolide

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5038
  • Mole Snacks: +405/-70
  • Gender: Male
    • My research history
Re: Retrosynthesis Problem
« Reply #1 on: December 24, 2012, 09:24:21 AM »
Break the bond between the left part nitrogen and the carbon, gives you a left part NH which can be alkylated with an alkyl halide right hand part or reactively aminated with a right hand aldehyde.Try that and see where it gets you.

Development Chemists do it on Scale, Research Chemists just do it!
My Research History

Offline luenne

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 3
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Retrosynthesis Problem
« Reply #2 on: December 25, 2012, 12:56:28 PM »
Thanks a lot for the fast reply. I found out that the compound on the left is commercially available (reaxys), please find it attached. But how do I mount the Florine and the 2 Nitrogens on form part of Compound 1, and respectively the 2 nitrogens on compound 2. any ideas?

Offline discodermolide

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5038
  • Mole Snacks: +405/-70
  • Gender: Male
    • My research history
Re: Retrosynthesis Problem
« Reply #3 on: December 25, 2012, 02:44:07 PM »
You can't use the 2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-fluorene as a starting material. There is no way to get the N atoms in that ring system. I won't even mention the F atom.
Development Chemists do it on Scale, Research Chemists just do it!
My Research History

Offline luenne

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 3
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Retrosynthesis Problem
« Reply #4 on: December 25, 2012, 02:47:42 PM »
I know some steps are probably not feasible, but would that be (theoretically) correct?

Offline fledarmus

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1675
  • Mole Snacks: +203/-28
Re: Retrosynthesis Problem
« Reply #5 on: December 25, 2012, 02:56:46 PM »
I think you'll find it more feasible to do your second disconnection on the pyridine ring rather than a pendant alkane on a cyclohexyl ring.

Sponsored Links