January 12, 2025, 02:36:02 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: C6H8 structure  (Read 5749 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Rutherford

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1868
  • Mole Snacks: +60/-29
  • Gender: Male
C6H8 structure
« on: December 29, 2012, 11:58:33 AM »
A substance has the formula C6H8. 1mole of it reacts with 2moles of hydrogen. When 1mole of it reacts with 1 mole of bromine only one product is made without counting the optical isomers. Determine its structure.

I don't know how to do it with only the data given here. It has 2 bonds and it has to be cyclic. The answer is 1,3-cyclohexadiene, but why can't it be e.g. the compound attached here? It gives 1 product when reacting with bromine, too.

Offline discodermolide

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5038
  • Mole Snacks: +405/-70
  • Gender: Male
    • My research history
Re: C6H8 structure
« Reply #1 on: December 29, 2012, 12:10:32 PM »
I suppose it could be that compound, in theory.
These are very unstable. I don't think the one you drew exists. If you make them you can coordinate them with an iron carbonyl which forms a pi-complex with the iron stabilising the cyclobutene. Done at low temperature.
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclobutadiene and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclobutadieneiron_tricarbonyl
Development Chemists do it on Scale, Research Chemists just do it!
My Research History

Offline Rutherford

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1868
  • Mole Snacks: +60/-29
  • Gender: Male
Re: C6H8 structure
« Reply #2 on: December 29, 2012, 12:17:11 PM »
Theoretically possible-should be enough to make the answer wrong. Thanks for the explanation.

Offline Wastrel

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 74
  • Mole Snacks: +5/-4
Re: C6H8 structure
« Reply #3 on: December 29, 2012, 12:30:10 PM »
You'd get three products brominating.  If the methyls were trans, that might fulfill the criteria.

Offline curiouscat

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3006
  • Mole Snacks: +121/-35
Re: C6H8 structure
« Reply #4 on: December 29, 2012, 01:24:13 PM »
Theoretically possible-should be enough to make the answer wrong. Thanks for the explanation.

Not if it doesn't exist.

Offline Rutherford

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1868
  • Mole Snacks: +60/-29
  • Gender: Male
Re: C6H8 structure
« Reply #5 on: December 29, 2012, 01:36:02 PM »
If I as a high school student get such a problem, I can't know whether such a compounds exist or not.

Wastrel-optical isomers aren't counted.

Offline Wastrel

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 74
  • Mole Snacks: +5/-4
Re: C6H8 structure
« Reply #6 on: December 29, 2012, 03:39:55 PM »
3 structural isomers.  Don't take the double bonds literally.

Offline Rutherford

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1868
  • Mole Snacks: +60/-29
  • Gender: Male
Re: C6H8 structure
« Reply #7 on: December 30, 2012, 04:21:52 AM »
Then it should be 3 isomers for a mixture of Z/E, Z/Z and E/E, but only 1 compound should be the answer.
Anyway this look like a conjugated diene so the 1,4-addition should be possible, too. Then the conjugated dienes are excluded leaving only 1,3-cyclohexadiene.

Sponsored Links