January 06, 2025, 08:05:38 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Short equilibrium questions  (Read 2508 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Rutherford

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1868
  • Mole Snacks: +60/-29
  • Gender: Male
Short equilibrium questions
« on: February 17, 2013, 11:49:53 AM »
For the reaction: A2(g) + B2(g) = 2AB(g), Consider the reaction yield η = neq(AB) / nmax(AB) as a function of the initial molar ratio A2 : B2 = x : 1 at any fixed temperature (nmax is the maximum amount calculated from the reaction equation). Answer the following questions qualitatively, without exact equilibrium calculations.

1.At what x the yield is extremal (minimal or maximal)?
2.What is the yield at: a) x :rarrow: ∞; b) x :rarrow: 0?
3.Draw the graph of η(x).


I thought that for x=∞ the yield is maximal, as the equilibrium will be shifted far to the right, so if there was 1 mole of B (nA=∞), I will get 2 moles of AB and the yield will be 100%. If there was 0 mole of A the yield would be 0 (minimal). But why would 1 and 2 be different questions then? Am I missing something?

Offline curiouscat

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3006
  • Mole Snacks: +121/-35
Re: Short equilibrium questions
« Reply #1 on: February 17, 2013, 12:12:50 PM »
If there was 0 mole of A the yield would be 0 (minimal).

This wasn't obvious to me. Isn't this a 0/0 limit that needs to be evaluated?

Offline Rutherford

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1868
  • Mole Snacks: +60/-29
  • Gender: Male
Re: Short equilibrium questions
« Reply #2 on: February 17, 2013, 12:42:53 PM »
Yeah, if nA=0, then the maximum amount of AB that could be produced will be 0, so nmax(AB)=0, and neq is 0, too, so the yield would be 100%  ???, right?

Offline curiouscat

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3006
  • Mole Snacks: +121/-35
Re: Short equilibrium questions
« Reply #3 on: February 17, 2013, 12:49:59 PM »
Yeah, if nA=0, then the maximum amount of AB that could be produced will be 0, so nmax(AB)=0, and neq is 0, too, so the yield would be 100%  ???, right?

Why?

If that uses  0/0 =1  you are wrong.

Offline Rutherford

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1868
  • Mole Snacks: +60/-29
  • Gender: Male
Re: Short equilibrium questions
« Reply #4 on: February 17, 2013, 01:13:06 PM »
According to the reaction equation, from 0 mole of A I would obtain 0 mole of AB. If equilibrium constant is introduced now, again from 0 mole of A I obtain 0 mole of AB, so neq(AB) / nmax(AB)=1 or 100%. I know that this is mathematically wrong, but if I am not right, what is the answer then?

Sponsored Links