I got only about 50 cards or so. as for the weight, I'm not really sure.
If you're going to have this work properly, you're going to have to be fairly sure -- better than ballpark, if not exactly sure. But not clueless.
I got only about 50 cards or so. as for the weight, I'm not really sure.
Then I think Chemicals might be cheaper. You should need very small quantities of chemicals.
We really don't know this, it could require quite a bit, and quite a mixture, to get all of the cards dissolved. And the some bits of electronic contents will likely survive some of the solvents, and leave a residue of metal. Plus a gloopy mess of softened plastic and waste solvent. Yeah, when I melt one plastic item in my house with some solvent, I just throw it away. I might even get a ticket for that, if I got caught. But if a company makes a half gallon of gloopy-solvent-and-plastic-mess-with-metal-bits-in-it, they can't just toss it out the back door. If caught they might face serious repercussions, frequent audits by the EPA, and other officials, of all their documents. Other businesses face other regulations all the time, they won't stand for one business claiming they're just going to do this once.
Our oldest tool -- fire, also makes pollution -- smoke, acrid gasses, some oxidized metal, but at least leaves less of a trace. Not that I would do it just because the boss has some weird security fetish. Seriously -- just shred them in a paper shredder -- this high tech chemistry game is just mental masturbation, you're not solving a genuine problem or addressing a significant, unrealized need.