a molecule always will try to become as energy-low as possible
electronic configuration on the other hand is only one aspect of the whole picture, with repulsive effects between the substituents on the other hand being another important factor.
sometimes geometry overrules , with respect to total energy balance
example:
methane does have 4 hydrogen substituents, and they're repulsive with respect to each other
arranging 3 of them under 90° (and the fourth one wheresoever), thereby forming 3 bonds of s-p-sigma type and one bond of s-s sigma type (i.e. not hybridizating the carbon at all) will lead to high repulsive effects between the former hydrogens
making room between those hydrogens would give energetic relief, but would be costly as carbon has to form sp
3-orbitals as a consequence
as a net effect this investment pays: arranging the substituents in a tetrahedral geometry will lessen repulsive effects, allow for better ("shorter") bondlength C-H , and will overcompensate the investment for hybridization by far
with PH
3 on the other hand, the picture is different: phosphor is lager in diameter , hence the repulsive effects in between the hydrogens (and, additionally, the free electron pair) won't be that hefty
in this case you'll see next to no hybridization at all: the hydrogens will be arranged under next to 90° (instead of 109,8 , as it would be the case with sp
3 hybridization) , in fact forming the s-p bonds mentioned at the methane (if only as a theoretical option there: here they become real), with the free electron pair remaining in the s-orbital at the phosphor
that's what hybrid orbitals are good for, and that's why they sometimes occur whenever the energy situation of the whole molecule will look better with their use
regards
Ingo