"Normality" is a concept quite irritating to people used to stoechiometric calculations based on mol/L and that like.
Nevertheless, it is a simplification for people who don't want to bother with calculations of what "on equivalent of iodine" would be like for a given reaction (like: reaction with sulphur dioxide): x mL * 1 N (iodine) always equals findings of n = x mL* 1 mol/L (SO
2)
obviously, the equivalent factors usually belonging to a certain reaction here are included into the concentration of for example the iodine-solution, making concentration * eq-factor become "normality"
hence, this is kind of a weighting-factor exclusively for a well defined reaction (and might be completely different if the same substance would be used in a different reaction)
"N" without explicit declaration of what reaction this "N" is belonging to is meaningless!
examples:
let's consider 2 reactions involving sulphuric acid
(a) formation of BaSO
4 :
1 Ba
2+ +
1 SO
42- BaSO
4 (
)
(b) formation of Ag
2SO
4:
2 Ag
+ +
1 SO
42- Ag
2SO
4 (
)
both substances are (next to) insoluble in water
let's say I wanted to measure the content of Ba
2+ and Ag
+ by their reaction with sulphuric acid by titration
with a 1 mol/L sulphuric acid i would detect n = x mL * 1 mol/L barium ions , hence the sulphuric acid is 1 N
in this caseon the other hand, with a 1 mol/L sulphuric acid i would detect n = 2 * x mL * 1 mol/L silver ions ("catching two birds with one stone") , hence the sulphuric acid is 2 N
in that case... even if the very concentration in mol/L in both cases is identical
so for your very reaction of iodine with sulfurdioxide, looking at the stoechiometric factors involved:
1 SO
2 +
1 I
2 + 2 H
2O
1 SO
42- + 4 H
+ + 2 I
-you see that a 1 mol/L iodine-solution would be 1 N for this reaction
regards
Ingo