January 04, 2025, 07:19:25 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Need for salt bridges  (Read 1385 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Big-Daddy

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1177
  • Mole Snacks: +28/-94
Need for salt bridges
« on: July 06, 2013, 07:33:57 PM »
Quote from my textbook:

Quote
To measure the E° for the Fe2+/Fe3+ couple, the single solution cell

Pt | H2 (g) | H+ (aq), Fe2+ (aq), Fe3+ (aq) | Pt

is inappropriate because at one Pt electrode the appropriate equilibrium Fe3+ (aq) + e-  ::equil:: Fe2+ (aq) is set up, but at the other both the Fe2+/Fe3+ and H+/H2 couples will try to establish their potentials.

And here's the part I don't get (immediately following on from the above):

Quote
In practice the fact that both redox couples are exchanging electrons readily with the electrode will mean that the downhill reaction (ΔG°=-0.77·F) Fe3+ (aq) + 1/2 H2 (g)  ::equil:: Fe2+ (aq) + H+ (aq) will be catalysed by the solution and thus move forwards to equilibrium. It follows that if sensible measurements are to be made to find E° for the Fe2+/Fe3+ couple, the two half-cells must be separated using a salt bridge.

The electrode which is not in contact with hydrogen will clearly set up the equilibrium Fe3+ (aq) + e-  ::equil:: Fe2+ (aq), but why can the other one not simply set up both equilibria at once, i.e. Fe3+ (aq) + H+ (aq)  ::equil:: Fe2+ (aq) + 1/2 H2 (g), and if it does, why does this stop the correct measurement for the E° of the Fe2+/Fe3+ couple from being made?

Sponsored Links