OK. Let's look at the procedure, and your results. Lambda max for the second trial is 410 nm. What reading did you get at 410 nm for the first trial? FWIW, I know the answer to this question, just by looking at your procedure. Its not a clean-cut answer, as in a number. But it is an answer, that explains the purpose of doing it this way. As for the intensity difference, there's another answer, likewise non-quatitative, but still, important. Another thing to consider -- what should max absorbance be? Is it correct to assume that a sample always give the exact same absorbance, for every sample, every time, in every instrument?