OK so first priority is for you to politely request to see copies of the certificates produced, including calibration checks and duplicate analysis of the sample.
Secondly you need to see copies of the calibration and service records of
all instrumentation used in the analysis. This includes the actual instrument used to determine the provided value and any balances and volumetric equipment (pipettes etc).
You also need to see assurances that any reference materials, internal standards and calibration standards were not out of date, were free from contamination and were supplied by a certified manufacturer.
Thirdly you need too ask to see up to date training records for every person involved in the sample handling, from start to finish (including the nurse who took the original sample through to the instrument operator and the person who validates the results).
If you ask for these things in a calm and polite manner (in writing, hand delivered) then it will show that you are not naive and that you are questionining the competence of the laboratory's quality scheme in a polite and non-confrontational way. Should they refuse any of this then your public defender will be able to ask why this information was not made available.
I have done some reading around US law and the value of 0.143 provided to you is in %m/v (mass of alcohol (in grams) per unit volume of blood (in millilitres).
The UK drink driving limit is 80 milligrams per 100 millilitres of blood, this is equal to 0.08% mass ethanol/volume blood of alcohol in the United States.
you have been provided with a value of 0.143% ethanol in your blood.
The instrumental run time for blood alcohol is around 4 minutes depending on the method used. The major time factor is calibration of the instrument to assure that the given value is correct.
This is the most commonly used instrument is head space gas chromatography (there are other providers which do the same thing, this is an example of one manufacturer)
http://www.chem.agilent.com/Library/flyers/Public/AAK%20Blood%20Alcohol%20flyer.pdfAs far as you are aware you did not consume
any alcohol prior to the accident or prior to the blood sample being taken, is this correct? No chance that your drinks were spiked?
Using the GC-Headspace method, with dual columns there is practically no posibility of false positives. If you have been taking medcines which contain ethanol then this may have contributed to the result but you would have needed to have consumed rather a lot.
You have stated your height at 5ft 3in, 1.6m tall.
I am afraid I have to estimate your weight as a medium build being 130lb so that's 59kg (please correct this where appropriate)
Given these values you would have needed to consume 52.3 grams of alcohol which is the equivalent to 66.3 millilitres of pure alcohol or 168 millilitres of 40% ABV spirit, 500 ml of 13% ABV wine or 1.3 lt of 5% beer to have a blood alcohol at 0.143% (these values have been rounded for simplicity and do not take into account alcohol elimination over time).
You have clearly stated that you don't drink so the only way that
any instrumrntation could detect alcohol in the specimine provided would be (a) it was deliberately put there, which is unlikely, or (b) two sample have been inadvertently mixed up.
This can happen, we are all only human. Therefore you will need to request analysis of the second sample (not the original sample) at an alternative, accredited, laboraory
The alcohol swab may skew the results slighly but if they took a 10 ml sample then 1.47 mg of ethanol would have had to be drawn up into the needle, this is quite a significant volume from a swab considering the diameter of the needle. I don't know if this would give such a high false positive reading.
I hope this helps.