November 24, 2024, 05:29:25 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Topic: Are these structures constitutional isomers?  (Read 2422 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mcchickenmonkey

  • Very New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-1
Are these structures constitutional isomers?
« on: January 13, 2014, 09:54:27 PM »


The only difference I see is how the group with the two oxygens (one double and one single bonded) is connected at a different point to the ring structure. It should be connected at 6 o'clock like on the Tamiflu. This would make them constitutional isomers, correct?


Mod edit: Img tags added. Please put image urls in img tags like this: [img]http://image url[/img].
« Last Edit: January 14, 2014, 02:49:55 AM by Dan »
Logged

Offline Dan

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4716
  • Mole Snacks: +469/-72
  • Gender: Male
  • Organic Chemist
    • My research
Re: Are these structures constitutional isomers?
« Reply #1 on: January 14, 2014, 02:53:07 AM »
I agree - same formula, different atom connectivity.
Logged
My research: Google Scholar and Researchgate

Offline mamid

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 30
  • Mole Snacks: +5/-1
Re: Are these structures constitutional isomers?
« Reply #2 on: January 14, 2014, 08:17:44 AM »
Rotate the 1st structure counterclockwise by 120 deg and you get the 2nd. Therefore, it's the same thing.
Logged

Offline AlphaScent

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 644
  • Mole Snacks: +24/-7
  • Gender: Male
Re: Are these structures constitutional isomers?
« Reply #3 on: January 14, 2014, 12:26:24 PM »
They are not the same.  They are constitutional isomers.
Logged
If you're not part of the solution, then you're part of the precipitate
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Sponsored Links