January 09, 2025, 11:55:18 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Cu catalyzed Click not a 1,3 addition  (Read 2675 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Nescafe

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 346
  • Mole Snacks: +7/-11
Cu catalyzed Click not a 1,3 addition
« on: May 04, 2014, 01:00:42 PM »
Hello,

I was reading about Click v.s. 1,3 cycloaddition and am having a hard time figuring out why Cu catalyzed click is not a 1,3 cycloaddition. Also, I find that the click mechanism is still under debate, does anyone know a single mechanism that is the least contested?

Thanks in advance,

Nescafe.

Offline 408

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 796
  • Mole Snacks: +103/-30
Re: Cu catalyzed Click not a 1,3 addition
« Reply #1 on: May 04, 2014, 01:36:33 PM »
1,3-is concerted, ie, both sides go at same time.

Get a transition metal in there, you are going to have stuff coordinating.  Both sides can't go if one is coordinated. 

Offline Nescafe

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 346
  • Mole Snacks: +7/-11
Re: Cu catalyzed Click not a 1,3 addition
« Reply #2 on: May 04, 2014, 01:43:21 PM »
1,3-is concerted, ie, both sides go at same time.

Get a transition metal in there, you are going to have stuff coordinating.  Both sides can't go if one is coordinated.

That makes sense, thanks for that, here is a snack! =)

Thanks,

Nescafe.

Offline Nescafe

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 346
  • Mole Snacks: +7/-11
Re: Cu catalyzed Click not a 1,3 addition
« Reply #3 on: May 04, 2014, 02:13:24 PM »
1,3-is concerted, ie, both sides go at same time.

Get a transition metal in there, you are going to have stuff coordinating.  Both sides can't go if one is coordinated.

How would one find out whether it is a concerted mechanism or not? Would it be required to do kinetic experiments as well as 14C or 15N labelled material to confirm a hypothesis? What is the typical way of determining it?

Thanks again,

Nescafe.

Offline TheUnassuming

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 461
  • Mole Snacks: +48/-1
Re: Cu catalyzed Click not a 1,3 addition
« Reply #4 on: May 05, 2014, 01:07:09 PM »
I've seen examples of people doing kinetic studies by NMR, trying to trap one of the intermediates, or quenching and work up the reaction before its complete and characterize the biproducts. 
If you can pull it off NMR would probably be the easiest. 
When in doubt, avoid the Stille coupling.

Offline kriggy

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1520
  • Mole Snacks: +136/-16
Re: Cu catalyzed Click not a 1,3 addition
« Reply #5 on: May 05, 2014, 01:36:45 PM »

How would one find out whether it is a concerted mechanism or not? Would it be required to do kinetic experiments as well as 14C or 15N labelled material to confirm a hypothesis? What is the typical way of determining it?

Thanks again,

Nescafe.

Depends how fast is the reaction. If its slow enough you can isolate the intermediate or do HPLC-MS  if not maybe stopped flow methods should work.
what reaction are you talking exactly? Can you share article or link?

Sponsored Links