Hi Anders, nice to see you back, we missed you!
Corrosion resistance comes through two (or are there more?) different mechanisms:
- The redox potential of noble metals. Nickel to iridium, the price follows more or less the chemical resistance;
- The formation of a passivation oxide layer: on Al, Cr, Si, Ti, Nb, Ta, approximately in this sequence and if I didn't forget any.
The corrosion resistent alloys tend to combine both, with the limits that
- The redox potential isn't very meaningful when an alloy is heterogeneous, and this is usually sought
- Miscibility limits the elements and proportions.
So starting from Fe-Cr stainless steel, you can switch to Ni-Cr (the suggested Hastelloy, still half-way affordable) then Co-Cr. Or go the Ti way. Or the Ta way, which is the best among the technological alloys.
Cr and Si can't be used pure because they're brittle. Si and Al aren't very soluble in most metals. And so on and so forth, metallurgy is nasty.
I worry when I read "any" kind of chemical. HF, even dilute, atacks SiO2 and makes Si useless as an alloying element - much so the other oxide-making elements. Mo protects stainless steel's cromium oxide layer against chlorine ions, but does it work for other alloys? My impression is that all oxide layer building elements fail under some condition, HF and Cl- being the more common ones, and that only noble metals resist these conditions.
----------
Must it be a metal? I'd rather try plastics and ceramics. Just PVC has impressive resistance to both acids and bases, oxidizing or not. Or PP. Silicon oxide won't survive HF, but maybe BN, Si3N4, B4C...?