November 25, 2024, 04:25:26 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Is a higher substituted alkoxide more or less stable than eg. methyl oxide?  (Read 2469 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline electronuc

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 3
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
So i can't figure this out.
There aren't any resonance forms to stabilize one more over another. Which is a better leaving group? (I know that alkoxides are strong bases - poor leaving groups)
Can it be that the higher substituded alkoxides are less stable because there are more electrons that destabilizes the negatively charged anion?

Offline electronuc

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 3
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
I mean methoxide and not methyl oxide, was tired when I wrote the first post.. -_-

Offline Babcock_Hall

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5707
  • Mole Snacks: +330/-24
I am not sure what you are asking.  You might compare the pKa values of methanol, ethanol, and tert-butanol, as a starting point.

Offline electronuc

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 3
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
I am not sure what you are asking.  You might compare the pKa values of methanol, ethanol, and tert-butanol, as a starting point.

Thanks! What I've learned now is that methanol is more acidic in solution than an alcohol with more branching due to solvation.
So, methoxide would theoretically be a better leaving group than a bigger alkoxide as it will be more stable in a solution.

I was trying to rank how fast a reaction would be for the same compound but with different alkoxides as leaving groups.
I first assumed that an electric effect played a part in the stabilty of ionic compounds.

Sponsored Links