According to Housecroft and Sharpe, Inorganic Chemistry, 3rd edition;
[Fe(CN)6]4- + Fe3+ --> Prussian blue
[Fe(CN)6]3- + Fe2+ --> Turnbull blue
due to FeIII4[FeII(CN)6]3 complex where there is an electron transfer between Fe(II) and Fe(III) for Prussian blue. I'm wondering would the situation be reversed in Turnbull blue FeII3[FeIII(CN)6]2?
I couldn't observe any difference in colour between Prussian and Turnbull.
I tried [Fe(CN)6]4- in Fe2+ and it produced this dirty milky blue green and then
[Fe(CN)6]3- in Fe3+ and it produced this opaque brown. Can I write these two reactions as:
[Fe(CN)6]4- + Fe2+ --> FeII2[FeII(CN)6]
[Fe(CN)6]3- + Fe3+ --> FeIII[FeIII(CN)6]
Also, SCN- with Fe3+ gave an opaque crimson blood red [Fe(OH2)5(SCN-N)]2+
However SCN- with Fe2+ gave a red not as opaque so could I write the product as [Fe(OH2)5(SCN-N)]+?
Lastly, I made a solution using FeSO4.(NH4)2SO4.6H2O and found it to be clear in colour (maybe with a green tinge if longer path length) and free of Fe3+ and consisting only of Fe2+. Adding [Fe(CN)6]4- and [Fe(CN)6]3- to separate solutions gave milky blue green and Turnbull blue respectively. So if the previous controls mentioned at the beginning of this post are true, I can say FeSO4.(NH4)2SO4.6H2O is Fe(II), right?