November 26, 2024, 05:27:59 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Appropriate no.s of significant figures  (Read 1887 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline thetada

  • Rhyming Chemist
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 182
  • Mole Snacks: +18/-0
    • Rhyming Chemist
Appropriate no.s of significant figures
« on: October 22, 2016, 04:21:16 AM »
I'm shamefully unsure of the rules dictating how to select the appropriate numbers of significant figures in calculations. It is a new feature of the UK A-level that students are expected to make such judgments, where in the past they could generally assume that any answer should be quoted to three significant figures. The point, I believe, is that there's no point in calculating with 6sf of Avogadro's constant if your measurements were only accurate to 3sf. So far so good, but in the A-level data sheet, the relative mass of hydrogen is quoted as 1.0. Does that mean that the answer to any molar calculation involving the relative mass of hydrogen should be quoted to 2sf?

Offline AWK

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7976
  • Mole Snacks: +555/-93
  • Gender: Male
Re: Appropriate no.s of significant figures
« Reply #1 on: October 22, 2016, 06:06:09 AM »
... the relative mass of hydrogen is quoted as 1.0. Does that mean that the answer to any molar calculation involving the relative mass of hydrogen should be quoted to 2sf?
Your reasoning is correct.
AWK

Offline thetada

  • Rhyming Chemist
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 182
  • Mole Snacks: +18/-0
    • Rhyming Chemist
Re: Appropriate no.s of significant figures
« Reply #2 on: October 22, 2016, 06:28:25 AM »
Thanks. I'm concerned this point might be lost on some examiners.

Sponsored Links