November 21, 2024, 09:07:28 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Electrophilic aromatic substitution  (Read 2939 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kateoik

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 4
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Electrophilic aromatic substitution
« on: March 29, 2017, 12:49:24 PM »
Two deactivates group like CN and CHO in position 1,4 what product will give me in an aromatic sulfonation?

Offline wildfyr

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1776
  • Mole Snacks: +203/-10
Re: Electrophilic aromatic substitution
« Reply #1 on: March 29, 2017, 10:32:10 PM »
Is this hypothetical? Because such a deactivated ring will probably take some serious cooking in real life to sulfonate, and those functional groups could fall apart under such conditions.

What is your first thought?

Offline kateoik

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 4
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Electrophilic aromatic substitution
« Reply #2 on: March 30, 2017, 10:54:02 AM »
It's an exercise that my professor gave me. Hai thought that I will have an electrophilic substitution that will go in position metà respect to CHO because CHO it's a little bit more reactive than CN. But I have to proof why it forms this product with the resonance formes. The formes are 4 in bought cases and the positive charge goes in bought groups. I don't know if I did well but I am desperate I can't find nothing similar on the internet

Offline kateoik

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 4
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Electrophilic aromatic substitution
« Reply #3 on: March 30, 2017, 11:00:53 AM »
Both cases and both groups.... sorry for the English

Offline wildfyr

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1776
  • Mole Snacks: +203/-10
Re: Electrophilic aromatic substitution
« Reply #4 on: March 30, 2017, 02:52:48 PM »

Offline kateoik

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 4
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Electrophilic aromatic substitution
« Reply #5 on: March 30, 2017, 03:32:47 PM »
Thanks

Sponsored Links