November 28, 2024, 11:39:01 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: IUPAC molecule  (Read 2162 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline melindaa

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 3
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
IUPAC molecule
« on: June 02, 2017, 06:58:51 AM »
Hi,

Between the IPUAC names:
3-ethyl-6,6-dimethyl-1,4-cyclohexadiene and
6-ethyl-3,3-dimethyl-1.4-cyclohexadiene

why is the latter name correct? I would have said that the first one was correct but I got marked wrong and I can't find anything in my notes to suggest why.

Please help me understand!!

Offline discodermolide

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5038
  • Mole Snacks: +405/-70
  • Gender: Male
    • My research history
Re: IUPAC molecule
« Reply #1 on: June 02, 2017, 11:26:04 AM »
Add up the numbers, the lowest sum is the correct one.
Development Chemists do it on Scale, Research Chemists just do it!
My Research History

Offline rmw

  • Very New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: IUPAC molecule
« Reply #2 on: June 02, 2017, 05:22:17 PM »
Although it is often repeated, there is no rule where we sum the locants. We use the set of locants that has the lowest number at the first point of difference when arranged in increasing order. This will not necessarily give us the same answer as the lowest sum.

For your molecule (ignoring the 1,4-diene bit as it's the same in both names) the sets of locants are:
3,6,6
3,3,6

The first point of difference is the second number in each set, 3 is lower than 6, so the bottom name is correct.


Sponsored Links