September 21, 2024, 04:22:06 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Internal standards and retention times  (Read 5680 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mir

  • Fascinated organic chemist
  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 310
  • Mole Snacks: +13/-3
  • Gender: Male
  • Visit my blog: mir.humle.be
    • My humble homepage with norwegian articles
Internal standards and retention times
« on: September 16, 2006, 09:44:03 AM »
Why do we choose Internal standards with retention time close to the analyte?

Every book I read says the same how important it is. But none of them explain axactly why.

Is it possible to use two internal standards with ret. times very different to the analyte, instead of one very close?
« Last Edit: September 17, 2006, 05:05:49 AM by mir »
No single thing abides, but all things flow.
Fragment to fragment clings, and thus they grow
Until we know and name them.
Then by degrees they change and are no more
The things we know.
- Titus Lucretius Carus

http://www.ife.no

Offline Dude

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 237
  • Mole Snacks: +42/-9
  • I'm a mole!
Re: Internal standards and retention times
« Reply #1 on: September 17, 2006, 03:16:37 PM »
I don't think that you will find a valid reason for that comment today.  The statement probably is probably a historical carryover concept to eliminate condition variables (ie volatility at a GC inlet, band broadening in the column).  With the advent of temperature programming in GC and gradients in LC, there is probably not a valid reason for that recommendation today.  If response factors are accurate and there are no systematic problems, I believe that an internal standard one minute offset from your sample would provide no benefit to an internal standard five minutes offset from your sample.

Offline gkdmaths

  • Very New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Internal standards and retention times
« Reply #2 on: October 23, 2006, 01:36:40 AM »
...I believe that an internal standard one minute offset from your sample would provide no benefit to an internal standard five minutes offset from your sample.

except for those four valuable minutes.  ;)

/gkd

Sponsored Links