November 25, 2024, 02:20:39 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: radius of ions  (Read 3942 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jennielynn_1980

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 167
  • Mole Snacks: +8/-4
  • Gender: Female
radius of ions
« on: July 27, 2006, 02:06:57 PM »
I am not sure I have the right answer here.  I feel like I am missing a piece of the puzzle.  The question is:

Arrange the following ions in order of increasing radius:
Cl, S2-, K, K+, O
Give an explaination of the postion of S2- in relation to the atom or ion that comes just before and just after it.

So here is my answer:

The order is: O, Cl, S2-, K+, K

For the second part of the question I think the answer is:
The electron configuration for Cl, S2-, and K+ are all very similar.  K+ and S2- both have the same electron configuration and Cl has one less electron in it's 3p shell.

Now what I can't figure out is this, if K+ and S2- both have the same electron configuration, then why isn't K+ smaller because it has more protons which would increase the electrostatic force between the electrons and the protons, pulling the electron cloud closer to the nucleus.   According to what I looked up, K+ has a radius of 152 pm and S2- has a radius of 103 pm.

Offline Neecze

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 23
  • Mole Snacks: +4/-1
  • Gender: Male
  • I just wanna know...
    • Polish Chemical Forum
Re: radius of ions
« Reply #1 on: July 27, 2006, 03:27:55 PM »
First question - dou you think that Cl, K and O are ions?

Quote
According to what I looked up, K+ has a radius of 152 pm and S2- has a radius of 103 pm.

But notice that sulphur has much more value of electronegativity than potassium. Because of weaker attraction of electrons K+ has bigger radius.

Offline jennielynn_1980

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 167
  • Mole Snacks: +8/-4
  • Gender: Female
Re: radius of ions
« Reply #2 on: July 27, 2006, 07:42:59 PM »
Okay, thanks for pointing that out.  That helps :)

Sponsored Links