Topic: Is this a valid structural formula of 4-ethyl 2 2 4 5 methylhexane? (Read 2369 times)

petarjovanovic17 · « **on:** November 06, 2019, 10:52:46 AM »

Sup bois, I'd like to know if this is a correct way of writing the structural formula of the compound from the title. Being read from left to right.

petarjovanovic17 · « **Reply #1 on:** November 06, 2019, 10:57:07 AM »

I meant from right to left.

petarjovanovic17 · « **Reply #2 on:** November 06, 2019, 04:38:44 PM »

Also, it's supposed to be "tetramethylhexane". Christ, I'm slow today.

AWK · « **Reply #3 on:** November 06, 2019, 04:53:44 PM »

Just ask Dr. Google using a correct name

petarjovanovic17 · « **Reply #4 on:** November 08, 2019, 11:51:12 AM »

Quote from: AWK on November 06, 2019, 04:53:44 PM

Just ask Dr. Google using a correct name

Real helpful, buddy. You don't think I've already tried that?

Also, 4-ethyl 2 2 4 5 tetramethylhexane is the only correct name of this compound that I know.

AWK · « **Reply #5 on:** November 08, 2019, 03:40:48 PM »

4-ethyl-2,2,4,5-tetramethylhexane - this is a correct name! - any sign is important

Topic: Is this a valid structural formula of 4-ethyl 2 2 4 5 methylhexane? (Read 2369 times)

petarjovanovic17

Is this a valid structural formula of 4-ethyl 2 2 4 5 methylhexane?

petarjovanovic17

Re: Is this a valid structural formula of 4-ethyl 2 2 4 5 methylhexane?

petarjovanovic17

Re: Is this a valid structural formula of 4-ethyl 2 2 4 5 methylhexane?

AWK

Re: Is this a valid structural formula of 4-ethyl 2 2 4 5 methylhexane?

petarjovanovic17

Re: Is this a valid structural formula of 4-ethyl 2 2 4 5 methylhexane?

AWK

Re: Is this a valid structural formula of 4-ethyl 2 2 4 5 methylhexane?

Sponsored Links