January 15, 2025, 02:54:29 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: are my transformations correct?  (Read 6274 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline pollution

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 6
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
are my transformations correct?
« on: November 26, 2006, 11:42:58 PM »
Hello, I have attempted transformations 1-5 of the 9 question worksheet and am wondering if they are correct.   I will attempt the other 4 questions and upload later.  I also have 2 other pages of predicting the product and mechanism I will attempt before uploading.   Thanks for any input.
« Last Edit: April 08, 2007, 11:34:16 AM by pollution »

Offline pollution

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 6
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: are my transformations correct?
« Reply #1 on: November 27, 2006, 01:03:50 AM »
Here answers 6-9.  I could not figure out #8 :(.
« Last Edit: April 08, 2007, 11:34:30 AM by pollution »

Offline movies

  • Organic Minion
  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1973
  • Mole Snacks: +222/-21
  • Gender: Male
  • Better living through chemistry!
Re: are my transformations correct?
« Reply #2 on: November 27, 2006, 02:09:00 AM »
Nice work, looks like most of them are right or at least on the right track.

In #2, using HCN directly doesn't really work, the two step way is a sure bet though. 

In #4, I think you have the wrong reagent.  NaBH4 is usually used to reduce ketones and aldehydes to alcohols, it won't touch alkenes.  I think you probably meant to use a different boron reagent (Hint!).

For #5, you propose an SN2 displacement on a tertiary carbon, which is a big no-no.  Think about the mechanism of the first step you proposed (where you add HBr).  How could you use a similar mechanism to make your product? (hint: 1 step!)

For #8, do you know any way to REDUCE a carbon to the alkane oxidation state?  There are a couple of ways to do it, but only one will give you only one D at the same position as the alcohol once was.

Offline tbuihuu

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-3
Re: are my transformations correct?
« Reply #3 on: November 27, 2006, 11:00:03 AM »
my answer

Offline tbuihuu

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-3
Re: are my transformations correct?
« Reply #4 on: November 27, 2006, 11:07:11 AM »
question 6: or 

Offline mdlhvn

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 63
  • Mole Snacks: +5/-2
Re: are my transformations correct?
« Reply #5 on: November 27, 2006, 12:10:53 PM »
Yeah! wonderful answers of a future organic professor!  :)
Try your best.

Offline pollution

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 6
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: are my transformations correct?
« Reply #6 on: November 28, 2006, 01:44:13 AM »
Here are my final answers  ;D
« Last Edit: April 08, 2007, 11:35:06 AM by pollution »

Offline movies

  • Organic Minion
  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1973
  • Mole Snacks: +222/-21
  • Gender: Male
  • Better living through chemistry!
Re: are my transformations correct?
« Reply #7 on: November 28, 2006, 12:49:20 PM »
5 is still wrong.

Offline pollution

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 6
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: are my transformations correct?
« Reply #8 on: November 28, 2006, 06:01:09 PM »
#5 is one of the right answers, there is more than one way to do it

Offline DaveD

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 20
  • Mole Snacks: +3/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: are my transformations correct?
« Reply #9 on: November 28, 2006, 11:22:42 PM »
I think a better answer for 5 would be to react the starting material with H2SO4 instead of HBr, in MeOH as the solvent.  HSO4- is not as nucleophilic as Br- , and you should be able to trap the t-butyl cation with your MeOH to form your desired product MTBE.

Offline movies

  • Organic Minion
  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1973
  • Mole Snacks: +222/-21
  • Gender: Male
  • Better living through chemistry!
Re: are my transformations correct?
« Reply #10 on: November 29, 2006, 01:02:35 AM »
I think a better answer for 5 would be to react the starting material with H2SO4 instead of HBr, in MeOH as the solvent.  HSO4- is not as nucleophilic as Br- , and you should be able to trap the t-butyl cation with your MeOH to form your desired product MTBE.

Exactly!

Sponsored Links