In a reaction involving gases, eg. Haber process for manufacture of ammonia : 1N2 + 3H2 --> 2NH3
Increasing pressure shifts equilibrium to the right (since there are 2 moles of gas on RHS compared to 4 moles of gas on LHS; a mole of any gas occupies the same volume at the same temp and pressure).
And yet, as long as the temperature remains constant, equilibrium constant remains unchanged.
For many students, this is puzzling and counter-intuitive, because they imagine that equilibrium constant means the ratio of amount of product to amount of reactants. If this was so, then increasing pressure certainly changes this ratio.
I believe the key to solving this 'riddle', is in the definition of Equilibrium constant, defined mathematically as the molarity of product(s) / molarity of reactant(s), each raised to the power of its stoichiometric coefficient.
Therefore, in a manner of looking at it, it is in order to maintain this mathematical definition of Kc, the equilibrium must (and therefore does) shift when pressure is increased/decreased. That is to say, the ratio of the amount of product to reactant does shift, but the *concentration* ratio or "equilibrium constant" (defined mathematically rather than by a simplistic ratio of "amounts") remains, by its very definition, constant.
Do you agree? Any comments? Thanks!