Eth = 2
CH3COOH has got 2 carbon atoms so it's ethanoic acid
it doesn't make sense....
You recognise that 2 carbon atoms results in the prefix "eth", so why does it not make sense that ethanoic acid has 2 carbon atoms?
However the alchohols formula is CnH2n+1OH
CH3OH
Ok let's break down the logic to this formula. The formula is an
alkyl chain and
OH functionalityCnH2n+1OHwhere n=1, Me; n=2, Et;...
Now, when naming carboxylic acids the C in the carboxylic acid functionality
does contribute to the prefix.
An analogous formula for alkyl carboxylic acids with
alkyl chain and
COOH functionality would be:
Cn-1H2n-1COOHWhere n=1, Me; n=2, Et;...
eg, if n=1, it's methanoic acid, with the formula C
1-1H
2(1)-1COOH = HCOOH
The formula you posted for carboxylic acids:
C
nH
2n+1COOH
is valid if you recognise that the C of the COOH
is contributing to the prefix, ie. that
n=0, Me; n=1, Et;... as Borek said.
As you can see, the lesson here is that thinking in these n=... formulas to determine the name is really overcomplicating something that is remarkably simple. Just count the carbon chain, that way you can't go wrong.