January 14, 2025, 05:53:27 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Lyophilization vs. Rotovapping  (Read 5170 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline LabTech

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 6
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Lyophilization vs. Rotovapping
« on: September 10, 2008, 12:19:36 PM »
I am preparing some small molecules for my collaborator to run assays on.  All the compounds I have synthesized so far have turned out to be oils, so in order to transfer them to vials prior to submission I dissolve them in ethyl acetate, transfer the solution to a vial, and rotovap off the ethyl acetate.  I leave it on the rotovap for awhile to dry, and then allow it to dry further under high vacuum.  I met with my collaborator yesterday and he asked if all my compounds were lyophilized.  I have been in working in organic chemistry labs for a few years, and I have never seen anyone lyophilize their samples prior to assaying, unless it is a peptide.  So I was wondering, would there be any benefit to lyophilizing my samples?  I have always assumed by allowing my compound to dry on the rotovap and under high vacuum would suffice for drying my samples.   

Offline Ist

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 6
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Lyophilization vs. Rotovapping
« Reply #1 on: September 11, 2008, 07:05:57 AM »
Hi,

Firt of all the crystallization would be better. I have tryed sometimes the lyophilization of not peptid type compounds and I got nice clean product but it was really air- and moisture sensitive. The crystals from same compound was more stable than the lyophilized material.

Offline Ist

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 6
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Lyophilization vs. Rotovapping
« Reply #2 on: September 11, 2008, 07:07:28 AM »
The rota it`s not good for lyophilization! You need higher vacuum!

Sponsored Links