Hello,
I'm going to pretty much duplicate what Borek has written, but in a bit more detail.
I think the phrase “substance X is in excess” makes people think the chemistry of the reaction is somehow different
I think there are two conditions the idea of “excess/limiting reagent” is trying to address
- There is “sufficient” amount of chemical X for the reaction to go to completion
- The concentration of substance X in solution does not significantly change during the reaction so this simplifies rate calculations
Let's take a specific example. Consider the reaction of calcium carbonate with hydrochloric acid. As Mitch writes, always start with a balanced equation
CaCO
3(s) + 2HCl(aq) → CaCl
2(aq) + CO
2(g) + H
2O(l)
Now, we can never
exactly get the number of moles of CaCO
3 to react with the number of moles of HCl in the ratio 1:2 for both reactants to be consumed completely. So we accept that and consider one reactant is in excess so the other is consumed completely. The reactant that is consumed completely is the limiting reagent. For this example, I feel it makes more sense to think of a situation where the calcium carbonate is consumed completely – so hydrochloric acid is in excess.
How do we use this information?
If we are told hydrochloric acid is in
excess then calcium carbonate is the
limiting reagent and
calcium carbonate is consumed completely by the reaction. First we calculate the amount of
moles of calcium carbonate we are given (probably from the mass of calcium carbonate in the question). Let's say this amount is
N moles. Then we use
the equation to determine that
2N moles of hydrochloric acid has been consumed. We don't need any information other than “hydrochloric acid is in excess” to get the 2N value. Then we can use the
equation to work out any of the
other quantities produced by the reaction. The most usual would be the amount of carbon dioxide which would probably be measured as a gas volume than a mass of carbon dioxide using the approximation 1 mole of gas occupies 24dm
3.
In the case of the rate, at a simplistic level (which is all I can think of at the moment) if hydrochloric acid is in excess, the concentration of hydrochloric acid does not significantly diminish through the reaction. Therefore that does not affect the rate. If we think of the CaCO
3 as a cube with sides 1cm, the initial surface area would be 6 x 1cm
2 = 6 cm
2 . Later when CaCO
3 had reacted with acid, the cube had sides 0.5cm (assume that happens) the surface area would be 6 x 0.25 cm
2 = 1.5 cm
2 . Hence less CaCO
3 is “exposed” to the acid and the rate drops. Eventually the reaction would stop as all the calcium carbonate would have been consumed. So you only need to consider the amount of CaCO
3 not the acid to think about the rate.
Clive