January 15, 2025, 10:03:31 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Naming of Stereoisomers  (Read 3936 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mbikel

  • Very New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Naming of Stereoisomers
« on: May 28, 2009, 03:32:10 AM »
Hello, all.

We're 3 PhDs in an office and we are trying to solve the different question:

What are the differences between the R/S and D/L systems for naming isomers. We understand that R/S is absolute, whereas D/L is derived from comparison with glyceraldehyde. But what are the real differences regarding use, advantages, etc?

Thanks a lot.

Offline StarvinMarvin

  • Chemist
  • Regular Member
  • *
  • Posts: 86
  • Mole Snacks: +5/-6
  • Gender: Male
Re: Naming of Stereoisomers
« Reply #1 on: May 28, 2009, 05:12:35 AM »
In my opinion, use of R/S is much simpler because only by learning three basic rules you can actually draw any molecule. D/L is more traditional and as it is relative stereochemistry, it has only a little to do with actual chemical structure. Yet, in some cases (sugars amino acids) D/L nomenclature is still in force as in that cases it's much quicker to understand what someone is referring to by writing, for instance, D-glucose.

So actually, D/L is more advantageous only in limited cases and only due to some tradition linked to it.

Sponsored Links