July 02, 2024, 07:47:04 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Empirical formula problem {Urgent}  (Read 3906 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kandyfloss

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 11
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Empirical formula problem {Urgent}
« on: November 29, 2009, 10:13:24 AM »
Here is the question :-
2.0 g of an oxide of iron contains approximately 0.60 g of oxygen and 1.4 g iron.What is the empirical formula of the oxide?
I know the question is easy but i dunno why i'm totally stuck on this one.
Here is what i did

I found the amount of 02 and amount of Fe
0.60/32 for 02 and 1.4/55.95 for Fe which gives me 0.018 mol and 0.25 mol respectively.
Now since there are two oxygen atoms in 02 i multiplied 0.018 x 2 = 0.036 mol
Now what? ???

Offline Borek

  • Mr. pH
  • Administrator
  • Deity Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27725
  • Mole Snacks: +1804/-411
  • Gender: Male
  • I am known to be occasionally wrong.
    • Chembuddy
Re: Empirical formula problem {Urgent}
« Reply #1 on: November 29, 2009, 10:28:00 AM »
So far so good, just 0.25 or 0.025 mole?

Now, assuming it was 0.025 - you know that iron oxide contains 0.025 mole iron per 0.036 mole of oxygen. What is their ratio? What is the closest pair of whole numbers with the same ratio?
ChemBuddy chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation, titrations.info

Offline kandyfloss

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 11
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Empirical formula problem {Urgent}
« Reply #2 on: November 29, 2009, 10:33:21 AM »
The ratio comes to be around 1:1.4

Offline DrCMS

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1299
  • Mole Snacks: +211/-81
  • Gender: Male
Re: Empirical formula problem {Urgent}
« Reply #3 on: November 29, 2009, 10:47:32 AM »
OK its FeO1.44 but we normally write these things with whole numbers. 

So now you multiply both sides until they are both whole numbers (or very close).

Offline kandyfloss

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 11
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Empirical formula problem {Urgent}
« Reply #4 on: November 29, 2009, 10:48:26 AM »
Oh ok so it seems if i multiply the ratio by 2 i get 2:3.8 ~3 > 2:3
Fe2O3
But why can't i use 1:1.4 as 1:~1 which gives FeO

Offline sjb

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3653
  • Mole Snacks: +222/-42
  • Gender: Male
Re: Empirical formula problem {Urgent}
« Reply #5 on: November 29, 2009, 11:02:41 AM »
1:1.4 -> 1:1 is about a 40% loss, so is perhaps not really the *best* that you can do, whereas 1:1.4 -> 2:3 is a much closer match.

It's good that you recognise FeO as a known compound, but especially with the transition metals there are a wide variety of oxidation states that they achieve.

Offline kandyfloss

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 11
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Empirical formula problem {Urgent}
« Reply #6 on: November 29, 2009, 11:13:19 AM »
Ok that seems to have solved my problem.
Thanks a lot to you all  :) Actually i was preparing for my chemistry test tomorrow.

Sponsored Links