Hi TMartin!
This is not for a class, but I would say it's more important than just a curiosity. I'm currently working on a research project in which I use organolithium compounds to create a new C-C bond. We have observed that LAH does the same reaction, except instead of adding an extra carbon chain to the substrate, it only adds a hydride. So, if we set up the substrates to match, as you suggested, we can synthesize one compound by both methods (RLi or LAH). All is needed is that the substrate carries the extra carbon chain before the reaction, when using LAH.
I was thinking of substrates that would fit well in the article I'm about to write, and I wanted to show that in some cases, LAH is not only a surrogate that can lead to the same compounds synthesized with R-Li, but that is has particular advantages. For instance, if a substrate carries a functional group (elsewhere in the molecule) that will be attacked by an organolithium, but not LAH, then the LAH pathway would be the best option for this particular substrate.
I have actually found one case in which the use of LAH is the only possible choice. In this case, the substrate possesses a very acidic proton that is removed by R-Li but hopefully not by LAH.
If you're thinking of more ideas, they would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks anyways for your answer!
S.