December 22, 2024, 11:43:51 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Thermodynamics  (Read 5996 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline vivekrai

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 71
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-5
  • Gender: Male
  • Love is in air
Thermodynamics
« on: February 22, 2012, 12:56:36 AM »
At 298K, the thermal expansion coefficient and the Isothermal compressibility of liquid water are and respectively. Then, for water at 300 K and P = 1.00 bar is :

*a) 1.5 * 10^4 bar
b) 3 * 10^-4 bar
c) 6 * 10^-4 bar
d) 9 * 10^-4 bar

I don't know how to proceed after this $$\partial \text{U}=\text{T}\partial S-\text{P}\partial V$$
" हर विफल्तापर पर न तुम आँसू बहाओ हर सफलता का यही पहला चरण है | "
**********************************************

Offline juanrga

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 231
  • Mole Snacks: +16/-11
    • juanrga - sharing unified knowledge in pure and applied sciences
Re: Thermodynamics
« Reply #1 on: February 22, 2012, 02:50:15 PM »
At 298K, the thermal expansion coefficient and the Isothermal compressibility of liquid water are and respectively. Then, for water at 300 K and P = 1.00 bar is :

*a) 1.5 * 10^4 bar
b) 3 * 10^-4 bar
c) 6 * 10^-4 bar
d) 9 * 10^-4 bar

I don't know how to proceed after this $$\partial \text{U}=\text{T}\partial S-\text{P}\partial V$$

In ## dU = T dS - P dV ##  you have a function ## U = U(S,V) ##, but in your above partial derivative

$$ \left( \frac{\partial U}{\partial V} \right)_T$$

you need a function ## U = U(T,V) ##.

You have to use the correct function if you want compute the partial derivative.
« Last Edit: April 03, 2012, 09:06:31 AM by Borek »
Sharing unified knowledge in pure and applied sciences

Offline Enthalpy

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4036
  • Mole Snacks: +304/-59
Re: Thermodynamics
« Reply #2 on: February 23, 2012, 09:39:21 AM »
4*10-6 bar can't be correct in your data!

Bulk modulus (adiabatic) for liquids and polymers is between 0.7GPa and 3.5GPa around 1atm (some liquid metals exceed that), with water around 2.5GPa if memory serves. That's 25,000 bar or 40*10-6 bar-1 adiabatically.

That is, you need many bar to change significantly the volume.

Offline vivekrai

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 71
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-5
  • Gender: Male
  • Love is in air
Re: Thermodynamics
« Reply #3 on: February 24, 2012, 01:02:57 AM »
Will this : $$ \left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial V}\right)_V =T\left(\frac{\partial p}{\partial V}\right)_T - P$$ ?
" हर विफल्तापर पर न तुम आँसू बहाओ हर सफलता का यही पहला चरण है | "
**********************************************

Offline juanrga

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 231
  • Mole Snacks: +16/-11
    • juanrga - sharing unified knowledge in pure and applied sciences
Re: Thermodynamics
« Reply #4 on: February 25, 2012, 02:48:46 PM »
4*10-6 bar can't be correct in your data!

Bulk modulus (adiabatic) for liquids and polymers is between 0.7GPa and 3.5GPa around 1atm (some liquid metals exceed that), with water around 2.5GPa if memory serves. That's 25,000 bar or 40*10-6 bar-1 adiabatically.

That is, you need many bar to change significantly the volume.

You are right. The isothermal compressibility coefficient (κ) of water at 50 ºC and 1 bar is about 44 x 10-6 bar-1.
Sharing unified knowledge in pure and applied sciences

Offline juanrga

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 231
  • Mole Snacks: +16/-11
    • juanrga - sharing unified knowledge in pure and applied sciences
Re: Thermodynamics
« Reply #5 on: February 25, 2012, 02:54:56 PM »
Will this : $$ \left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial V}\right)_V =T\left(\frac{\partial p}{\partial V}\right)_T - P$$ ?

How you take the partial derivative against volume maintaining volume constant? Why two different Ps?...
Sharing unified knowledge in pure and applied sciences

Offline vivekrai

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 71
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-5
  • Gender: Male
  • Love is in air
Re: Thermodynamics
« Reply #6 on: February 26, 2012, 06:47:07 AM »
Will this : $$ \left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial V}\right)_V =T\left(\frac{\partial p}{\partial V}\right)_T - P$$ ?

How you take the partial derivative against volume maintaining volume constant? Why two different Ps?...

That's just Latex gone wrong. Also may be because I haven't been into thermodynamics so much. Should I leave this because I have not read this? Or I should get some information on it(How?)
" हर विफल्तापर पर न तुम आँसू बहाओ हर सफलता का यही पहला चरण है | "
**********************************************

Offline juanrga

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 231
  • Mole Snacks: +16/-11
    • juanrga - sharing unified knowledge in pure and applied sciences
Re: Thermodynamics
« Reply #7 on: February 27, 2012, 02:20:49 PM »
That's just Latex gone wrong. Also may be because I haven't been into thermodynamics so much. Should I leave this because I have not read this? Or I should get some information on it(How?)

Ok I assume that you have the correct Helmholtz equation
$$\left( \frac{\partial U}{\partial V} \right)_T = \left[ T \left( \frac{\partial p}{\partial T} \right)_V - p \right]$$
The right hand side is a function of pressure, temperature, and isocoric variation of pressure with temperature. Pressure and temperature are given and you would be able to compute the isocoric variation of pressure with temperature. Do you know the definitions for ##\beta## and ##\kappa## and how to do this?
« Last Edit: April 03, 2012, 09:06:56 AM by Borek »
Sharing unified knowledge in pure and applied sciences

Sponsored Links